112 points madihaa 2 hours ago 55 comments
smallerize 2 hours ago | parent
233mhz 1 hour ago | parent
roosterIllusi0n 1 hour ago | parent
It get worse when we find out they did it to increase nvidia production for the purpose of being able to redirect more output to china.
The whole entire AI bubble was actually jensen's smuggling operation to china. These large data centers have no purpose and cost more money in power grid upgrades than any company will ever make operating them.
The only winners look to be jensen's bank account, the bank accounts of the CEOs that signed the deals to buy unneeded hardware, and the chinese buisnesses that were able to buy more nvidia graphics cards.
It is not a crime for these CEOs to drive their companies into the ground to make themselves richer. Most CEOs do this today. It is a crime if we find out all of this was really a chinese smuggling operation and that would make it the largest crime per monetary value in US history.
Everyone who made money on this smuggling ring has criminal liability. Just like with madoff, the people who withdrew gains had to pay it back because the gains weren't real. Not paying it back would make you an accomplice.
smallerize 1 hour ago | parent
Ok that sounds interesting and it's not in this article. Where can I learn about that?
Akronymus 1 hour ago | parent
A quick search turned this article up https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/faa-orders-...
lizknope 18 minutes ago | parent
Satya Nadella said last year they have GPUs sitting that they can't use because the data centers don't exist.
https://redmondmag.com/blogs/generationai/2025/12/microsoft-...
That sounds like horrible planning. Build the data center and when it is 90% complete then order the GPUs. The theory is that Nvidia says buy now or get nothing later.
What the Wall St Journal is saying is that Nvidia basically has an oversupply of GPUs that they are committed to buying from TSMC. The hyperscale companies are designing their own AI chips so they don't want as many Nvidia chips. So Nvidia is giving startups money to buy Nvidia chips in exchange for equity in the startup.
beloch 1 hour ago | parent
...
"Amid the rollout of the program, Kress raised questions including how to decide which deals to pursue, how to value the guarantees, and how to calculate the return on investment, a person familiar with the matter said. Behind the scenes, she tried to rein in Huang’s son-in-law, who had been promoted to a vice president in January, people who worked with her said."
----------
It sounds like there may have been a little bit of Nepotism. This article also suggests that Huang himself was uncomfortable with the deals Nvidia and the data centres it had invested in were making, although he appeared to shift blame onto those running the data-centres.
-------------
"In Berlin during a conference, Huang, accompanied by his top sales executives, broadcast a new message to a half-dozen CEOs of companies that are major buyers of Nvidia chips who were seated around a circular table. He opened with a story that sounded like a fable, according to people who attended.
Huang had once found a soup vendor in Japan, he said, with a long line of customers. He joined the line, and after a long wait, enjoyed one of the best bowls of soup he’d ever had. When he asked for another serving, the soup-seller told him no—he had too many customers waiting and not enough soup for all of them.
“He’s a better businessperson than all of you,” Huang told the cloud computing CEOs. The soup-man doesn’t sell out all his inventory to one or two customers, but instead keeps prices high and his customer base diverse, the CEO said.
“You are not establishing the value of my products,” he said."
butterisgood 1 hour ago | parent
It’s like the oil companies whining and fleecing us too.
What’s the move though?
lukeify 1 hour ago | parent
lvl256 1 hour ago | parent
233mhz 1 hour ago | parent
CamperBob2 1 hour ago | parent
goodmythical 1 hour ago | parent
stale2002 1 hour ago | parent
goodmythical 50 minutes ago | parent
readthenotes1 1 hour ago | parent
Of course, free markets tend to become unfree without regulation they are a bit of a unicorn.
0x4e 25 minutes ago | parent
I agree that the “invisible hand of capitalism” is ironic, but the free market is circular in and of itself creating an unfree market.
kxrm 15 minutes ago | parent
reenorap 1 hour ago | parent
It’s not. It happens ALL THE TIME. This isn’t “circular financing” which is a great meme term but is not factual.
cpburns2009 18 minutes ago | parent
lukeify 1 hour ago | parent
cremp 1 hour ago | parent
doitLP 1 hour ago | parent
krasin 14 minutes ago | parent
Mellanox ([1]) acquisition by NVIDIA was a monopolistic move and they should be forced to spin out Mellanox as an independent public company.
The same applies to Hugging Face. That deal should have never been approved.
keyle 46 minutes ago | parent
lizknope 24 minutes ago | parent
There are stories of huge amounts of sold chips sitting in warehouses unused. This could be channel stuffing which is illegal
There are stories of Nvidia threatening that customers have to buy these chips now or they will be cut off and not able to buy the next gen. That may be illegal
anigbrowl 10 minutes ago | parent
rustcleaner 4 minutes ago | parent
randypewick 1 hour ago | parent
stephc_int13 1 hour ago | parent
Greed and hubris. I think the turbulences will be painful to some, especially those who counted on Nvidia stock to finance their retirement.
But, big picture, this is good news.
breakyerself 1 hour ago | parent
martinald 56 minutes ago | parent
stephc_int13 52 minutes ago | parent
jokoon 30 minutes ago | parent
well it's no secret that this sort of stock was not that good, I don't think that many people counted on nvidia for their retirement
TuxedoBuddy 13 minutes ago | parent
greggoB 7 minutes ago | parent
The whole "it's to maximise shareholder value" refrain is not actually a thing, AFAIK, despite it being something people like to keep repeating.
alfiedotwtf 6 minutes ago | parent
hnuser123456 4 minutes ago | parent
intothemild 1 hour ago | parent
https://respawnfirst.com/multiple-reports-say-nvidia-manufac...
Forgeties79 48 minutes ago | parent
lizknope 27 minutes ago | parent
Zitron already has a video about it but he is just reaffirming what the article already said.
flaque 44 minutes ago | parent
That's not "deliberately keeping GPU prices high" and it's really weird to frame it this way.
It is good that Nvidia focused on supporting startups!
whatever1 41 minutes ago | parent
They finance the selling of their inventory.
m3kw9 36 minutes ago | parent
lizknope 29 minutes ago | parent
Nvidia allegedly engineered scarcity by funding AI startups to buy its GPUs (techpowerup.com)
0o777 6 minutes ago | parent
It was an open secret that 'LLM inferencing as-a-Service' was a license to print money until very recently, and still is if you like CoreWeave, Crusoe, Xai etc. can get LLM inferencing deals from OpenAI and Anthropic.
Nvidia invested in genuinely investment attractive businesses. The "circular financing" accusation just seems like wishcasting from the anti-AI crowd.
maximilianroos 3 minutes ago | parent
if there were some cabal buying them to keep purchase prices high, then rental prices would be falling; it would be unprofitable to buy them in order to rent them out. but actually the opposite is true