56 points helloplanets 1 hour ago 25 comments

rafaelRiv 56 minutes ago | parent

It is not the same, it is worst. Nothing seems functional nowadays

onlyrealcuzzo 47 minutes ago | parent

> Nothing seems functional nowadays

It also wasn't functional before-a-days [=

brink 23 minutes ago | parent

Now we have the added benefit of nobody understands it.

ChrisLTD 21 minutes ago | parent

There’s AI chat bots bolted into every app now, so there’s that

_aavaa_ 50 minutes ago | parent

The video does actually answer its own title, which is refreshing.

And I agree, it’s because organizations and people haven’t changed (yet, if you’re being positive) what it is they’re optimizing for and how they do work. AI gives you more of what you want and gives it faster, that doesn’t on its own change the culture or goals of a company.

ch4s3 47 minutes ago | parent

A thousand times this. A lot of people are discovering that coding was never the bottleneck in their orgs and don't know what to do differently.

bsenftner 36 minutes ago | parent

The communication skills to create the synchronized understandings necessary for teams of any moderate size to operate in concert is not there. Communications are everything when it comes to collaborations at any level, and we as an entire civilization are weak at this aspect. This effective communication necessity.

coffeebeqn 22 minutes ago | parent

Also AI don’t seem to make communication better, worse if anything. I’m so sick of the whole team not understanding what is going on with Claude written docs and tickets

superxpro12 2 minutes ago | parent

a lot of what i do with ai is write (gasp) requirements. which is horrifying to engineers for some reason.

ogogmad 30 minutes ago | parent

The more code, the more worry; the more workers, the more theft; the more AI, the more sorcery; the more flesh, the more worms.

The ancients knew it all along!

sumtechguy 22 minutes ago | parent

That also is dependent on the company and who works there. Some companies are meeting heavy. A meeting for every little decision. Some are not. Some are paperwork heavy and you need to fill out the form to do anything. Coding is like the 4th or 5th on the list of things that get done. Handed to the most jr of devs to 'just figure it out'. Some companies are just not software companies but they have enough of it that they needed but do not care about it. They only care enough to get their hardware out the door. AI in this case only changes when software is done and how. Not all of that other stuff. Such as have you checked in today during your standup and that your story is progressing?

andrewstuart 21 minutes ago | parent

>> coding was never the bottleneck

What utter twaddle.

I’m old enough to remember pre AI programming and it very very much was the bottleneck.

ido 20 minutes ago | parent

> old enough to remember pre AI programming

So old enough the remember the ancient times back in 2023?

nathanfries 17 minutes ago | parent

I think it was indeed the bottleneck, however the assumption that "coding is the bottleneck" was baked into how organizations were measured, optimized, staffed for the last couple of decades.

skydhash 6 minutes ago | parent

From "The Mythical Man-month" (1995 ed)

  For some years I have been successfully using the following rule of thumb for scheduling a software task:
    l/3 planning
    l/6 coding
    l/4 component test and early system test
    l/4 system test, all components in hand.
The separation can be blurred if you follow an iterative approach (also explained in the book), but it aligned roughly with my experience. And whenever I helped a colleague in the past, coding was not the problem. It was either the lack of planning (no data modelling, no rough algorithm design), or no test setup (trial and error coding). It was never the coding part. Syntax errors is trivial to solve (with any good editor) and most libraries have good reference docs (not learning the library is an orthogonal matter).

barbariangrunge 5 minutes ago | parent

bottlenecks constantly change. every time you fix one, a new one emerges. coding is and isnt the bottleneck depending on your organization at that snapshot in time. It often was, and often was not

tracerbulletx 45 minutes ago | parent

Good supporting evidence for this is that it is changing your software dramatically if you're making your own personalized software to replace subscription software. That works incredibly well. Also there are some examples of companies doing huge swings they wouldn't have done without it like the AWS emulator that just came out.

the_sleaze_ 23 minutes ago | parent

People just haven't figured out the tools yet.

I'm doing truly astounding - stupefying - levels of work. Others on my team are actively resistant to my advice but the C Suite isn't.

The numbers are shooting up and to the right but people don't want to get on board. It's too much too fast.

clarle 16 minutes ago | parent

I think that's really the key for the most productive individuals I've met.

A lot of things that I've paid for subscription services in the past I've just replaced with personalized software for myself. It's not something I would ever release publicly for others to use because I'm sure there's a million edge cases that wouldn't work for a broader audience, but it's perfect for me and saves me a ton of money.

guhidalg 13 minutes ago | parent

This is just like in woodworking and jig making. Sure you can buy a pre-made jig, but you can now just 3D print (vibe code) one that's good enough and is uniquely made for the way you work.

Does this mean that jig makers out there are out of business? Sort of, they need to sell jigs complex enough that you wouldn't want to / be capable of making.

utopiah 7 minutes ago | parent

The most productive individuals were already doing that before, maybe they were "just" scripting, doing macros, going to training on how to extend their workflow. The most productive individuals didn't wait for AI to bother IT by explaining how THEIR very unique situation was special and they needed that one special tool nobody else wanted. They were already using FLOSS tools or heck even had a budget dedicated for a dev to help them precisely because they care. Nothing changed for them ... but for those who wanted to emulated them and never dared, maybe those do have now an excuse to try.

datadrivenangel 32 minutes ago | parent

I find Jonathon Blow to be insufferable, but this is a good talk with good opinions.

dominotw 24 minutes ago | parent

I was talking to my friend yesterday about what exactly has AI changed for us. Our lives are still the same( actually worse from job loss anxiety). If this tech is so revolutionary how come nothing in my life has changed positively.

My friend is in managment at faang and he said ai has changed how tech coders now behave at work. he is enjoying the fact that "their tails have been cut by AI". Made his management job infinitely easier.

yesb 6 minutes ago | parent

I think that has more to do with the job market than "AI". All my coworkers have become yes-men due to perceived job insecurity. Not sure this is a positive thing even if it's superficially appealing to a middle-manager.

drcongo 4 minutes ago | parent

So your friend's life is not still the same?