112 points ksec 34 minutes ago 39 comments

automatic6131 33 minutes ago | parent

Wow, this is enormous. End of the AI bubble?

LLMs will be completely unaffected, but the pricing remains to be seen.

chinathrow 14 minutes ago | parent

Bad timing for ANT?

nicce 11 minutes ago | parent

Excellent timing, if this reduces the amount of GPUs sold to China. Open weights are threat to ANT. Coincidence that happened just before IPO?

dbalatero 29 minutes ago | parent

baalimago 25 minutes ago | parent

I'm guessing this is the most expensive affair in history?

paxy 21 minutes ago | parent

Divide it by 2 and each of them come out cheaper

bbor 16 minutes ago | parent

Meh, not really. NVidia stock is presumably rebounding as we speak -- unless they pick someone political or unhinged to take over, this will just be a blip.

And I doubt it'll cost him much. What could you pay the founder of the second most valuable company on the planet who already holds $150B in equity? It'd be as absurd as paying Donald Trump.

grey-area 13 minutes ago | parent

-12% in premarket. Definitely not rebounding. It has lost 35% in the last month at the moment. That’s not trivial.

So if he held 150B stock say before, now he has 100B.

The rest of the market isn’t looking very solid either.

ksec 12 minutes ago | parent

> NVidia stock is presumably rebounding as we speak

I am not sure if you and I are looking at the same chart. Down 12% Pre Market.

qwytw 9 minutes ago | parent

> NVidia stock is presumably rebounding as we speak

Not in premarket so far, 12% down sing yesterday.

Also why would it do better? Overall Huang seems to be a highly competent CEO. Replacing him with someone seems risky (especially if the board is influenced by Trump & co.). Especially given that Nvidia never had any other CEO.

dmurray 9 minutes ago | parent

Probably in dollars, but Anthony and Cleopatra cost themselves the two greatest empires in the known world.

teknologist 24 minutes ago | parent

Why would he resign on this note? He could have powered through it for a couple more years, and asserted leadership.

vidarh 22 minutes ago | parent

Presumably he was not given a choice by the board.

cinntaile 19 minutes ago | parent

Time will tell if this is the best for the company... I hope he was a very hands-off CEO and mostly did marketing gigs.

qwytw 7 minutes ago | parent

> I hope he was a very hands-off CEO and mostly did marketing gigs.

Hard to imagine that could have been the case given that he was Nvidia's CEO from the very beginning.

lkbm 6 minutes ago | parent

My understanding is that he was a very consolidated-power CEO. No real second in command / replacement-in-training.

But that doesn't preclude there being a lot of competent talent on the second rung. (I think 60 people reported directly to him.)

dofm 21 minutes ago | parent

Not sure people have grasped how serious this all is; the second affair alone would fell most CEOs because it was with an employee.

But my guess is, he'd rather resign on this note than what will come out in a few weeks.

teknologist 11 minutes ago | parent

I know we're all very sensitive these days. But he was running a multi trillion dollar company.

stetrain 7 minutes ago | parent

And the board of that company decided that the risks he presented to the company outweighed the benefits.

creatonez 5 minutes ago | parent

A multi-trillion dollar company... so the standards are lower?

stetrain 3 minutes ago | parent

That does seem to be the way of the world lately. Sure this person is awful but look at the shareholder value they have created!

frogblast 21 minutes ago | parent

Because the CEO serves at the pleasure of the Board. The board decided it was time for him to go.

Then it was a negotiation about how.

Sometimes people can see the writing on the wall and choose to not burn down their life’s work on the way out.

koolba 5 minutes ago | parent

> Because the CEO serves at the pleasure of the Board. The board decided it was time for him to go.

That’s also why more recent tech companies got rid of that pesky independent board by having total voting control.

FireBeyond 20 minutes ago | parent

There is evidence of a second affair that is also problematic coming out, the BBC had some reports.

bbor 20 minutes ago | parent

Because it would be damaging to the company which he founded and has a massive stake in, both financial and personal.

paxy 15 minutes ago | parent

He didn’t resign he “resigned”

silverFork 14 minutes ago | parent

Resignation means that he can start liquidating his shares without input from shareholders or directors.. Divorce will also be likely. Affairs with the staff would matter if he had promoted people; who knows what else is in that stack. He had planted his own kids with no experience in tech as executives there too . He is a zillionaire though and he has enough cash for many generations.

Don't worry about him.

teknologist 10 minutes ago | parent

I'm concerned about how this affects the industry, not his personal life

thomasjeff1 21 minutes ago | parent

He must have come in cross hair with the state somehow,

catchnear4321 15 minutes ago | parent

Step one: don’t even give the appearance of infidelity as a c-level unless you’re Elon.

It’s really not hard.

nickalaso 14 minutes ago | parent

So, I understand this is getting priced in to some degree, but I just don't see how any of this will change the fundamental core business value of NVIDIA.

Even if they have to pay a fine or increased regulatory scrutiny. At this point NVIDIA is more like SHELL(10 years ago maybe/during oil spill scandal) than a tech company. Its going to keep printing money with its chips.

So, I guess I'll timestamp my prediction that now is a good time to buy NVIDIA stock.

frogblast 9 minutes ago | parent

“some fines” could be a very big deal. Sanctions laws have teeth.

How much of Nvidia’s revenue came from infringing sales to china? If so, that revenue is probably going to disappear as now they will have to really be serious about export controls or face much greater pain. Some estimates I’ve seen is 30% of their revenue perhaps disappearing overnight!

LogicFailsMe 4 minutes ago | parent

They'll be fine for a few years with a talking donkey running the place because they have a roadmap. And then when the situation on the ground has changed and the future is ambiguous, they will nosedive like SGI did. My money is on Huawei now. Way to go America! You've actually outdumbed the CEO's poor choices of mistresses.

barrenko 4 minutes ago | parent

Sort of agree but he did go around and spoke how export controls to China have no effect, and then he's in bed with a foreign asset, so lots of geopolitical stuff in there.

Plus whole lot of people waiting for that signal that the "AI bubble " is about to burst.

newAccount2025 13 minutes ago | parent

Yay for powerful people being held accountable for their actions. Do Musk next.

LastTrain 5 minutes ago | parent

Ooh a real world test of whether CEOs are dispensable.