79 points drbm 2 hours ago 10 comments
hbcdbff 1 hour ago | parent
Claudeslop snuck in at the very end
pavel_lishin 1 hour ago | parent
(Compared to 12,700 entries in the `things-that-now-work`. I'm not sure if that is a list of bugs found that were then fixed, or if the total list of ~20k things is meant to be the list of features they intend to support.)
s_dev 1 hour ago | parent
ChrisArchitect 1 hour ago | parent
yevmiyeci 1 hour ago | parent
killingtime74 48 minutes ago | parent
jaggederest 14 minutes ago | parent
Once your new version has no disagreements, it's a really clean swap. I am working towards developing this way and I think, if taken to extremes and carefully, it can remove the review requirement most of the time.
4ndrewl 23 minutes ago | parent
I mean that's a job, but in many orgs it's been done by (cheaper) non-engineers (business analysts, QA professionals) for decades. So what does an engineer do?