55 points randycupertino 1 hour ago 18 comments
nervai 1 hour ago | parent
We've completely normalised big tech pushing straight up scams on the population.
dboreham 6 minutes ago | parent
adrr 57 minutes ago | parent
csnover 50 minutes ago | parent
[0] https://www.techdirt.com/2020/06/23/hello-youve-been-referre...
georgemcbay 42 minutes ago | parent
If you're earning almost 200 billion dollars a year directly from the posting of a certain type of content, you can afford basic moderation to avoid obvious scams and fraud.
Terr_ 17 minutes ago | parent
I think the key part worth emphasizing is that sites with zero moderation don't need Section 230. Section 230 is what gives you the option to start some moderation without suddenly becoming liable for everything that passes your best-effort filter.
So abolishing Section 230 means erasing most of that moderate middle, leaving us with either pure-chaos sites, sites which make you sign a painful legal contract before you can comment, or sites that block all comments and only let you "like" things.
scosman 54 minutes ago | parent
> Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
gottorf 40 minutes ago | parent
triceratops 20 minutes ago | parent
Right, through his 401k
jhloa2 50 minutes ago | parent
7373737373 37 minutes ago | parent
anenefan 30 minutes ago | parent
[1] https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-08-11/andrew-forrest-meta-s...
jedmeyers 15 minutes ago | parent
peterbecich 11 minutes ago | parent
mirashii 5 minutes ago | parent
https://www.reuters.com/investigations/meta-is-earning-fortu...
This is nothing new, profiting off of fraud and abuse has been the name of the game for all the big advertisers from the beginning.
dpkirchner 6 minutes ago | parent
I could LLM this up but eh. It won't actually convince Googlers to do the right thing so it'll just stay a terrible idea.