9 points johnjwang 2 days ago 4 comments
Someone 1 day ago | parent
For example, for the 12.5°, 15° and 20° ones, replace the two blocks in the top layer by the construction used for the top two blocks in the 25° record.
Also, I think “A lone upright block tips over at 11.3° in its thin direction” doesn’t imply “no matter what you do to the base, you can’t stand blocks up vertically at high tilts.”
I would think you could sneak in cage-like structures like these (seen from the top)
ABB A
A D ABB
CCD CCD
D
with blocks A and D taking most of the north-to-south loads and B and C taking most of the east-to-west loads.Possibly that will only work near the base, where there is more pressure from above that prevents these blocks from falling over.
Possibly, such a construct with only three (at 120° angles) or two blocks could work, too.
yorwba 1 day ago | parent
jameshart 55 minutes ago | parent
If they aren't then the blocks can be rotated relative to one another to cancel out floor unevenness.
Hnrobert42 21 minutes ago | parent
Or what about stacking off-center/cantilevered against the lean?
I was never very good at these physical engineering problems. I was always really impressed by my classmates who understood it intuitively.