32 points tomrod 4 hours ago 8 comments
xvxvx 1 hour ago | parent
IMO this misses the mark. Yes, it’s a decent attempt at simplifying cybersecurity, but if this is aimed at entry-level, non-technical people, it’s not gonna work.
One of my earliest jobs was to redesign training materials for one of the worlds largest companies. I stripped the training to its core, the true basics, and started there. The results were remarkable. I feel the urge to do the same with this document…
jaggederest 56 minutes ago | parent
philosopherNoob 9 minutes ago | parent
I do a lot of explaining to non-techy people. My approach would be to print out the document and walk through it with them. Have the goal first be understanding of why certain things are a priority. Like it’s a baseball game: the three outfielders and three infielders are important to covering all your bases. We’re talking about this angle, in this context, and once the “why” is understood it’ll help them interpret the document correctly.
dkobia 31 minutes ago | parent
312c 30 minutes ago | parent
philosopherNoob 17 minutes ago | parent
It’s a darn fancy algorithm and a cool tool. Putting it on a pedestal instead of grounding it to reality is not going to help anyone. My condolences to the authors.
alhirzel 14 minutes ago | parent
tkdb 6 minutes ago | parent
Requests for comments from career security experts: is this any good?