105 points lacoolj 1 hour ago 51 comments
rvz 1 hour ago | parent
Imagine swarms of abliterated frontier AI models that reach >20,000 TPS. As I said before [0] you are going to have to hire specialized security engineers or technical bodyguards from the senior to senior staff level using AI agents to protect your entire business.
Otherwise you are cooked.
samwilliams 1 hour ago | parent
pawelduda 59 minutes ago | parent
tripleee 44 minutes ago | parent
ProllyInfamous 40 minutes ago | parent
singinwhale 40 minutes ago | parent
jdprgm 35 minutes ago | parent
samwilliams 16 minutes ago | parent
lacoolj 43 minutes ago | parent
vsgherzi 32 minutes ago | parent
Is that really the best way to do things? I’m not really sure what an agent offers here does it just look at logs and do actions? I would not really feel safe if that’s my service’s answer to security.
I could see it maybe as a really smart filter to block ips that are sending probing requests but I don’t really see that as a good reason to have an agent be sitting 24/7 looking at logs.
scottrogers86 42 minutes ago | parent
shoobiedoo 41 minutes ago | parent
lelandfe 34 minutes ago | parent
I'm hoping goverments take stock of what is online that needn't be.
Arbortheus 21 minutes ago | parent
14u2c 27 minutes ago | parent
spydum 1 hour ago | parent
6thbit 57 minutes ago | parent
onei 24 minutes ago | parent
Once you declare the incident, the process includes these status page updates, alongside equivalent internal status updates.
In this case, they probably wanted to maximise coordination, so used the process designed for that.
lacoolj 49 minutes ago | parent
dofm 21 minutes ago | parent
pugworthy 44 minutes ago | parent
minimaxir 41 minutes ago | parent
6thbit 30 minutes ago | parent
georgemcbay 25 minutes ago | parent
Ask HN: Who didn't get hacked today.
sublinear 23 minutes ago | parent
paaloeye 43 minutes ago | parent
optimalsolver 43 minutes ago | parent
I don't see how web services proceed like business is normal.
peri-cl 31 minutes ago | parent
- Tell HNN: pets.com was *not* owned today
- Tell HNN: about:blank was safe, too
- Show HNN: my new gopher protocol project—no currently known CVE 10's
mceachen 21 minutes ago | parent
(archie and veronica are non-denumerable)
LtWorf 22 minutes ago | parent
elashri 38 minutes ago | parent
6thbit 31 minutes ago | parent
If you are running services and don't yet have an easy way to react to these things with swift process defined, I hope you don't like to sleep.
lifeisloving 22 minutes ago | parent
I dont think my security posture is all that much different than it was last year. Use a Secret Manager and or encryption, have backups, strong firewall rules, use canaries of some kind.
If anything llms are making security worse because there's more people offloading their thinking on llms, or people that skipped some steps in their learning journey because they just ask the llm to do everything. I dont think its necessarily because attackers have llms now, but that contributes.
moscoe 14 minutes ago | parent
Arbortheus 27 minutes ago | parent
nout 25 minutes ago | parent
jeremyjh 21 minutes ago | parent
throwuxiytayq 16 minutes ago | parent
Your intuition that this can be balanced out is wrong. When you have a CVE in your TCP stack, your vault unlocks and you're fucked, it's done. My dude, there is never going to be AIs scanning every incoming packet for signs of a 0day, and deciding whether to, uhh, cut it up with a lightsaber and shoot it with a laser pistol. Your options are to have a stack so secure that it can't be targeted, or to disconnect all network cables.