51 points n_plus_1_acc 1 hour ago 83 comments
OsrsNeedsf2P 1 hour ago | parent
xnorswap 1 hour ago | parent
3 days ago: https://github.com/eggert/tz/commit/5b5b39dae16f787740b8c0d4...
It's not even the latest change to the library!
zombot 1 hour ago | parent
F3nd0 1 hour ago | parent
oddIdentities 1 hour ago | parent
What everyone missed is that DST could itself lead to much greater loss of life than we might have lost had the use of DST been mandated all the way through to e.g. large naval, air or spacecraft.
And as research into DST continues, this seems to have been not merely an abstract possibility was missed, but _the actual outcome_. DST is quite literally killing people by the thousands.
mrweasel 1 hour ago | parent
Some people absolutely loves DST for some reason, but it creates stress and mental problems for people, especially in the north. The long mornings are somehow worse than the short evenings. Technically it shouldn't matter what the clock shows, but when society insists on things happening at a certain time, whether or not the sun is out becomes important.
For the Russian case see: https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-news-from-elsewhere-28423647
paganel 31 minutes ago | parent
We don't care about the people living in the North, there are more of us living not in North and as we live in a democracy (the EU) the majority vote should cound on this.
skeledrew 18 minutes ago | parent
thendrill 1 hour ago | parent
Yehh Europe is loosing its mind..
I belive this whole clock fliopity flip twice a year is a huge contributing factor to people's "unbalance", and worsening mental state... Especially the northern parts....
We humans are creatures of habit... Mess with the circadian rhythm of en entire population and expect no adverse effect.... Mhm checks out.
jansan 1 hour ago | parent
tchalla 1 hour ago | parent
leipert 38 minutes ago | parent
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_18_...
echoangle 1 hour ago | parent
How would something that has been in effect for at least 60 years still lead to a worsening mental state over time?
wiseowise 48 minutes ago | parent
echoangle 45 minutes ago | parent
thendrill 22 minutes ago | parent
https://aasm.org/advocacy/position-statements/daylight-savin...
The transition from daylight saving time to standard time leads to depressions https://clin.au.dk/display/artikel/the-transition-from-dayli...
sschueller 53 minutes ago | parent
marliechiller 39 minutes ago | parent
input_sh 34 minutes ago | parent
This is a very European / North American problem for some reason. There are some exceptions, but in general Asia, Africa and South America don't do this.
phgn 1 hour ago | parent
ssl-3 1 hour ago | parent
(Unfortunately, it always gets derailed by highly-polarized discussions about whether to stay on DST forever or get rid of it forever. They'll be showing up here again soon enough.)
oddIdentities 1 hour ago | parent
ssl-3 46 minutes ago | parent
But can we... uh... can we keep that as some kind of tertiary issue to solve later after we successfully stop screwing up the clocks twice every year? We don't really need to build a singular omnibus clock overhaul that will most assuredly never come to fruition, do we? :)
mhd 56 minutes ago | parent
boonzeet 1 hour ago | parent
murderfs 49 minutes ago | parent
wafflemaker 1 hour ago | parent
If they keep doing it indefinitely, they're looking at some serious profits and boost to GDP.
vasco 54 minutes ago | parent
berkes 46 minutes ago | parent
But what does matter in Cuba, is Savings.
The country is in shambles, beyond bankruptcy, in cases literally starving. Because of it"international" sanctions. Severe shortages of petrol, water and energy.
So it wouldn't be surprising if, by moving the clock every year in just one direction, petrol, water and electricity is saved. And it wouldn't even be suprising if that actually happens.
stavros 36 minutes ago | parent
throw-qqqqq 32 minutes ago | parent
He even takes it a step further:
“Why settle for turning back time just one hour? Think about how much we f*cked up the world in the past 30 years! Let’s turn time back 30 years and fix that mess!”
gvieri 1 hour ago | parent
Heliosmaster 1 hour ago | parent
mystifyingpoi 52 minutes ago | parent
It completely fails when you account for everyone else around you. Could work if you live alone with flexible working hours. But having a semi-active social life and kids makes it impossible.
paganel 35 minutes ago | parent
As a counter-point, I personally don't even notice it. Also, I live in Romania, so every trip West of the border, even just to Hungary, means a one-hour change, so, again, no big deal.
flohofwoe 24 minutes ago | parent
Svip 1 hour ago | parent
[1] https://timeinrussia.com/daylight-saving-russia/ [2] https://www.newsweek.com/the-us-tried-permanent-daylight-sav...
dubcanada 43 minutes ago | parent
torvald 55 minutes ago | parent
w3ll_w3ll_w3ll 52 minutes ago | parent
It's better to make a common decison about this, so we are stalled.
mcv 43 minutes ago | parent
stavros 38 minutes ago | parent
LluisGerard 38 minutes ago | parent
mdlxxv 4 minutes ago | parent
Spain is already in the wrong time zone for standard time, and when DST hits, it's two hours off the time we really should have. It's unnatural for daylight to last until 22:00 or nearby in june and july in Spain's latitude. A bit more and we'd end up with some kind of midnight sun, like we were in the Arctic Circle. It's ridiculous.
I mean, it's usually so hot, and getting hotter every year, that you can only go outside somewhat comfortably after nightfall anyway, so I'd actually prefer if it got dark at 20:00 or earlier in the summer, as it should be. On the other hand, it's horribly demoralizing for me when it's almost 8:30 in the morning in mid-october and it's still so dark. Going back to standard time, like we did a few days ago, gives me a brief respite, but unfortunately dark mornings will soon return in a month or so.
matwood 36 minutes ago | parent
wongarsu 33 minutes ago | parent
karlosvomacka 30 minutes ago | parent
Much better than having sunset before 16:00.
nkmnz 28 minutes ago | parent
flohofwoe 28 minutes ago | parent
nkmnz 23 minutes ago | parent
Evidence-backed benefits of morning light exposure:
Advances the circadian clock, helping shift the body's biological night earlier. Randomized controlled study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24179293/
Promotes earlier sleep timing and may improve subjective sleep quality. Systematic review of 45 studies: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30670164/
Improves alertness, attention, and reaction times, although average effects are small. 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis of 150 studies involving 5,401 participants (daytime light, not exclusively morning): https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2025.2493669
Helps treat seasonal depression (SAD). Systematic review and network meta-analysis of 17 randomized trials involving 773 patients: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40629637/
Can improve outcomes in nonseasonal depression when bright-light therapy is added to treatment. 2024 meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials involving 858 patients: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39356500/
Natural daylight exposure helps synchronize the biological clock with the solar day. Experimental research found that exposure to natural light-dark cycles advanced circadian timing compared with modern indoor lighting environments: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23910656/
tedodor 29 minutes ago | parent
not-kinsale-joe 38 minutes ago | parent
lgrebe 38 minutes ago | parent
Someone 24 minutes ago | parent
Closer to their solar time, for quite a few. As an extreme example, most of Spain lies West of the prime meridian (some parts of it even west of Great Britain, the island), but its time zone is an hour ahead of that of London.
mantas 14 minutes ago | parent
DocTomoe 6 minutes ago | parent
This traditionally has been solved in two ways:
1. do the split and accept that you will have costs associated with different time zones and sleep/wake cycles in your population (e.g.: USA / Soviet Russia)
2. don't do the split, and have the cost by putting a time/light adjustment burden on the population (e.g.: PRC, European Union)
My preferred solution would be to abandon all time zones and use something like UTC, or yet better: .beat / Biel Mean Time [1], which does not come with a 'oh, 12 means midday' penalty.
mantas 17 minutes ago | parent
I'm quite north (but not the far north) but I'm strongly for DST. If we went for solar time, we'd loose long bright evenings in the summer but have sun at 3am. Spring/fall evenings would be much darker too. I hate time switching. But I'd rather switch then loose DST summer evenings. Otherwise we'd loose a lot of outdoorsy socialising on weekdays
But some people don't go outdoors after work. And they prefer brighter mornings for couple extra weeks. During the winter the mornings are dark with or without DST.
_ph_ 4 minutes ago | parent
In my personal opinion, the only reasonable decision would be to permanently return to the standard time before the introduction of DST. Because otherwise the whole European timezone would have to be redesigned.
input_sh 1 minute ago | parent
throwaway27448 55 minutes ago | parent
therealfigtree 51 minutes ago | parent
15o9o 47 minutes ago | parent
timonoko 48 minutes ago | parent
RandomSwedish 45 minutes ago | parent
dsign 44 minutes ago | parent
tomkarho 39 minutes ago | parent
aussieguy1234 38 minutes ago | parent
presentation 34 minutes ago | parent
nkmnz 30 minutes ago | parent
maratc 12 minutes ago | parent
Time has stopped being an astronomical fact, and is a social contract nowadays. It's possible that you can afford to opt out of that contract, but most people can't.
nkmnz 4 minutes ago | parent
Instead, the public discourse centers around which minority can force the majority to follow their preferred terms in the social contract. At best, it's a zero sum game - most likely, it's a net loss for everyone if we include all externalities, especially the suppression of discussions about more individuality.
ComSubVie 15 minutes ago | parent
igleria 9 minutes ago | parent