78 points Luc 1 hour ago 54 comments
zabriel_goss 1 hour ago | parent
rnd0 1 hour ago | parent
This seems redundant and requiring more overhead while providing less reliability than something like Kiwix to me.
nico 1 hour ago | parent
mapontosevenths 1 hour ago | parent
That way the tiny model isn't acting as a potentially incorrect interpreter but you still get semantic search to help you find the right documents quickly.
I suppose there is something to be said for a good summarization, I just worry that these tiny models aren't really GOOD summarizers.
nico 1 hour ago | parent
I'm all up for using the better/simpler task for the job. That's been a thing lately also with the Jev/decision models hype, most of those things can either already be done by a pretrained classifier[0], or you can start with a bigger model and then train your smaller/adhoc one when you have some data (it doesn't even take much for most applications, you can get about 95% accuracy on email classification with 50-100 examples)
0: http://jeffyclassify.com/blog/when-llms-fail-at-classificati...
rafterydj 1 hour ago | parent
tourmalinetaco 1 hour ago | parent
The bigger issue in this context would be canning, such as incorrectly explaining the mechanisms to avoid botulism (acid and/or pressure canning), or perhaps incorrectly wiring in repairs. However, again, it’s best to practice with these prior to emergencies anyway.
It should be noted though, that the model does source its claims, so you can fact check it and should review this information regularly.
tourmalinetaco 1 hour ago | parent
Undoubtedly useful in the right contexts, particularly for local repair or homesteading, but “survival” does imply that this would be more useful in an SHTF situation.
x3haloed 56 minutes ago | parent
Kiwix is great, but I'd also like a language model to be able to deeply interrogate all of that information much faster than I can read.
Just arrange its harness so that its responses are grounded in the source material and require source citations for everything. Then read the citations to confirm it's not a hallucination.
rebolek 23 minutes ago | parent
dorianmariecom 17 minutes ago | parent
lrvick 18 minutes ago | parent
You can run bonsai2 27b on basically any gaming GPU from the last 15 years including on game consoles.
Everyone has access to this stuff now if they bothered to look beyond the marketing from big labs trying to collect subscription revenue.
I work on compilers, kernels, and operating systems using exclusively consumer GPUs.
ASalazarMX 2 minutes ago | parent
Consider they won't have access to the plentiful practice opportunities we have now, most resources would have to be spent with a practical goal.
nico 1 hour ago | parent
majorchord 1 hour ago | parent
anonbeat 1 hour ago | parent
good1andrew 1 hour ago | parent
TheRealPomax 1 hour ago | parent
bityard 1 hour ago | parent
This project at least attempts to ground its answers with (presumably) human-vetted sources. That will make it much, MUCH more accurate and truthful than a bare model. But there is still a non-zero chance for it to hallucinate answers, especially when posed a question that it doesn't have any source material in its database.
As for why bother hooking up an LLM instead of a simple search engine, search engines don't synthesize data from multiple sources into a coherent answer for you, but LLMs are (mostly) great at that.
That said, while I like this pattern (LLM + knowledge base) for lots of things, this isn't necessarily something I'd trust with my own (or my family's) survival.
SwellJoe 40 minutes ago | parent
I think if I had to build an emergency LLM today, that had to run on modest hardware, I'd bet on Gemma 4 12B. It's got excellent reasoning and good vision/audio and speaks 140 languages.
But, I don't know about the "classic" knowledge base theory, though. Is there a high quality curated pile of survival information that could be bundled into a web UI and made searchable in a knowledge base? The LLMs aren't focused on that topic, so there's a lot of wasted space, but they know a little about a lot of things, including survival topics. Combined with Wikipedia, and maybe a few other sources, you're probably better off with one than without.
I guess one could use some huge models plus web search to compile/distill a focused survival knowledge base or LLM.
Edit: Project NOMAD seems to mostly be exactly that. It has authoritative sources in a searchable knowledge base and the tiny LLMs are an afterthought, which is probably what they should be. https://www.projectnomad.us/
johnnudd 1 hour ago | parent
Five minutes of clicking and a (small) power station is a small price to pay when survival could be at stake.
armcat 1 hour ago | parent
walrus01 1 hour ago | parent
In a theoretical scenario where the internet is gone and isn't coming back: If you can deal with a very low token/second rate there's no reason not to store 'offline' a much larger model like qwen 3.8-flash-next or deepseek v4 flash 1017 and use an inference engine which can stream-read it off disk to extract the information you want, albeit slowly. Of course also download and use things that'll fit in RAM, sure, like the qwen 3.8 27B in the linked page. But no need to restrict yourself to only smaller models.
saaaaaam 1 hour ago | parent
So on a regular consumer machine this is going to be wrong nearly half the time. Great! Let’s hope it’s only on the simple stuff and not the “how do I perform an emergency appendectomy”.
Honestly, just buy some books.
dvt 57 minutes ago | parent
saaaaaam 41 minutes ago | parent
taneq 25 minutes ago | parent
bityard 56 minutes ago | parent
saaaaaam 43 minutes ago | parent
I’m pretty sure it also told you how to butcher a sheep.
I used to be obsessed with it as a kid. The spectre of nuclear war and a three volume handbook on how to survive the impending apocalypse with nothing more than a plastic bucket, a packet of potassium permanganate, some charcoal and string. The late 80s and early 90s were a wild time to be a kid.
arjie 35 minutes ago | parent
taneq 22 minutes ago | parent
arjie 2 minutes ago | parent
yoble 1 hour ago | parent
I found Project Nomad (https://projectnomad.us) which looks more polished. Any other suggestions?
iqbal1980 24 minutes ago | parent
TGower 1 hour ago | parent
x3haloed 1 hour ago | parent
Helps you download a local LLM and offline Wikipedia. Probably easier to just ask your favorite agent to glue something together yourself these days.
tpoacher 57 minutes ago | parent
abujazar 55 minutes ago | parent
Also: "Apple could not verify “Survival LLM” is free of malware that may harm your Mac or compromise your privacy." This is obviously some vibe coded trash from an inexperienced dev.
doublerabbit 53 minutes ago | parent
mentalgear 50 minutes ago | parent
The source (data collection) seems the most important feature here worth reusing.
x3haloed 39 minutes ago | parent
It's perfectly safe to use LLMs to surface underlying data and knowledge without having to trust that it's giving you correct advice.
Use the LLM as search technology: string match -> semantic search -> search intelligence.
This is especially helpful when you don't know the right question to ask. Semantics only help you find text that is semantically near the input query. Semantics won't help you when what you are looking for is connected to what you have by something other than semantics, like causation, mechanism, or interpretation.
Trying to figure out why your crops aren't growing well will likely require you to read several articles across a range of sciences, probably scoped to the specific conditions you are dealing with. A semantic search is not going to surface those first.
Allowing an LLM to chain together several sources for you to read first does not require you to ask it for a conclusion.
ASalazarMX 9 minutes ago | parent
They're amazingly useful tools, but they're nowhere the level believers want them to be, not yet.
tobadzistsini 37 minutes ago | parent
jonathaneunice 35 minutes ago | parent
From the command line: unsloth studio
Browse to the URL it gives you (eg http://127.0.0.1:8888/)
Download a good fast local model e.g. Gemma-4-12B (small machine) or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B (larger memory). Or a Nemotron model, if you prefer that.
Then you'll have both your backup/emergency assistant that runs on your own computer and be gaining skills in a common, frequently-updated, well-supported program.
VikingCoder 33 minutes ago | parent
lutusp 31 minutes ago | parent
But kidding aside, this is an interesting reveal on the ease with which a custom LLM can be spun up to fit a particular niche application, especially for systems not meant to host an LLM.
riazrizvi 25 minutes ago | parent
Apocalypse emergency I don't need help on. My crisis brain has collected more than enough info and capabilities over the decades.
lrvick 22 minutes ago | parent
Some kid with the right prompt will supply chain attack a dependency of a dependency of firmware for border routers just to watch the world burn, or runaway AI swarms will saturate all bandwidth. Or a Linux kernel zero-click vuln. So many ways this can happen.
Better to prepare a bit and never need it.
jahrichie 19 minutes ago | parent
nathanfig 19 minutes ago | parent
tl;dr: Local LLMs are really really bad at offline navigation.
That said, pairing the survival guide with a library is totally the right move.
jojobas 17 minutes ago | parent
jojobas 17 minutes ago | parent