39 points lizziepika 1 hour ago 20 comments
rkarthik1993 1 hour ago | parent
Rather than write an essay about why we built this, I’d rather just answer whatever you’re skeptical about. Happy to get into the actual mechanics: how sessions get attached to commits (it’s git refs, not a side db), what the 89x push number does and doesn’t mean, where the context/token savings fall apart, who can read whose session transcripts, how you’d migrate off if you hated it, whatever.
The one thing I’ll say up front: The bet is that once agents write most of the code, the PR stops being the right unit of review, because the diff is cheap and the “why” vanishes when the session ends. Everything else follows from that.
Ask away, I’ll be in the thread for a while.
argee 46 minutes ago | parent
Also, if your business has agents writing most of the code, why would your business care about human reviews at all? In for a penny, in for a pound, after all. Wouldn't you be better off looping your agents into your support tickets and autofixing bugs? In that scenario, isn't it more confusing for an agent to deal with sessions + code rather than start fresh with the code?
solyin 39 minutes ago | parent
0gs 43 minutes ago | parent
is the carrot JUST the time savings for large dev orgs?
Haimantika 13 minutes ago | parent
You can read more about session storage on our docs here: https://docs.entire.com/guides/checkpoints/checkpoint-storag...
conartist6 41 minutes ago | parent
This isn't a belief. What do you actually believe about the future of software?
Let me put it this way. The premise of agents is that some combination of programming languages and programming tools suck so incredibly much that humans don't want to use them.
You're effectively betting that this problem can never be fixed. AI is a layer of kludges on top of the problem of bad programming tools. Haven't you ultimately made a rather cynical bet?
lizziepika 6 minutes ago | parent
salt-licker 34 minutes ago | parent
This feels insincere coming from a venture-backed software startup. Do you have a unique ownership structure, or a particular emphasis on open-source or self-hosting?
abhisinghs 5 minutes ago | parent
Haimantika 1 hour ago | parent
stryan 50 minutes ago | parent
philipwhiuk 48 minutes ago | parent
hedgehog 27 minutes ago | parent
Haimantika 22 minutes ago | parent
Haimantika 28 minutes ago | parent
For Trails: There’s agent sessions, gates, agents(evals basically) and checks - so it gives you all the information you need to review better (compared to the diffs for example).
Here’s our docs link too: https://docs.entire.com/guides/trails/overview
Here if you have additional questions!
shepherdjerred 36 minutes ago | parent
I would happily try this out if it were going to be free for the next 1-2 years, or if I knew that the upcoming bill would be reasonable
Haimantika 34 minutes ago | parent
TLDR: You only get charged for Agents. We also give you a $100 signup credit.
alexzhues 4 minutes ago | parent