13 points firefax 7 hours ago 4 comments
KingMob 1 hour ago | parent
tancop 1 hour ago | parent
Is this really an open question? It sounds simple to me. Your vote raises the likelihood that someone from your party becomes the pivotal voter by a tiny amount. It's like increasing your share on a pie chart when someone is blindly shooting at it and the color that gets hit wins. People care about their candidate winning, not about personally deciding the election.
magicalhippo 1 hour ago | parent
Here in Oslo, the local elections some years ago was decided by six votes out of about 300k votes (~500k eligible), between a left-leaning majority and a right-leaning majority.
It's often close but not that close.
ozb 27 minutes ago | parent
it's not hard to come up with an aggregate social welfare valuation of many billions of dollars for this election, especially considering the effects on non-Israelis also
So here the case for voting, at a cost of thousands of dollars, is rather straightforwardly rational, assuming only that one is somewhat unselfish; and possibly even if one is selfish the individual stakes could be equivalent to thousands of dollars