55 points pieterr 2 hours ago 43 comments
pmkary 2 hours ago | parent
sklargh 1 hour ago | parent
Edit: when I say the experience was novel, I mean I had only heard the faintest of news that I was going to this amazing show. I had no prior visual information on what to expect -
cainxinth 58 minutes ago | parent
I want to see the Sphere in Vegas, but so far there hasn’t been an act that interest me. Frankly, all I need are two actors in robot costumes to press play on Alive 2007.
skrebbel 1 hour ago | parent
I quite like Daft Punk but that ™ makes them uncool very quickly. Immediately makes me assume it's just a brand name now, run by an agency, music work outsourced to freelance ghost composers, and so on. Like Philips TVs and "Jamie Oliver" cookware.
coldpie 1 hour ago | parent
skrebbel 44 minutes ago | parent
_fuchs 1 hour ago | parent
When i built the lego hogwarts set i had to read through stuffs like this. I know. Lego is a big corporation. Harry potter is too. normaly i can ignore that i am just feeding money to geedy Corporate. But i could not this time
saghm 43 minutes ago | parent
Waterluvian 27 minutes ago | parent
Theodores 1 hour ago | parent
I wonder if LEGO is going to follow the same fate, to no longer be of interest to Roblox and Minecraft obsessed kids, to develop an increasingly elderly customer base, ending up with just retirees.
Daft Punk became a household name in the late 1990s, placing their core audience as Gen X, which is reasonably elderly, and well on the way for the kids to retirees pipeline. Expect LEGO to be grand-pa only in a couple of decades.
What remains of the train set business makes a token effort to appeal to kids, all of it is priced out of their league and not marketed to them in ways of yesteryear. Instead it is all about limited edition, very expensive and highly accurate models that get sold to a diminishing customer base, necessitating ever higher prices and further consolidation in the industry.
Imaginably, LEGO in twenty years time will be like this, making nothing but a token effort to sell to kids yet making money with expensive and even more elaborate reissues of models such as this one.
Hopefully this won't be the future of LEGO, however, they do need this adult market given how kids don't play with toys now they have tablets.
benfortuna 1 hour ago | parent
The (electrified) lego train set was a solid product and didn't cost anywhere near what star wars lego does. Same for technics.
jareklupinski 1 hour ago | parent
adults are on their tablets too, tho pretty much shell out for nostalgia
i'm a little miffed mindstorms and the 'smart/connected' lego stuff didnt take off
i could imagine it would be a real cool bridge between generations if they could see a lego light turn on and off in their parents' builds when you e.g. hit a switch in minecraft or did a redstone circuit
RhysU 1 hour ago | parent
Wikipedia says that Gen X was born 1965 to 1980. They are therefore aged 61 to 46. Not one of them has hit early retirement age in the US.
skybrian 1 hour ago | parent
RhysU 59 minutes ago | parent
heffro 1 hour ago | parent
But they also don’t really know about tablet games yet.
skeeter2020 1 hour ago | parent
Ylpertnodi 16 minutes ago | parent
KerrAvon 9 minutes ago | parent
(Of course, it's not possible to keep them in isolation forever and I wouldn't even suggest it. But good on you for keeping it that way so far.)
codeulike 1 hour ago | parent
microtonal 47 minutes ago | parent
I don't think this is true at all. Our daughter played a lot with Duplo and then Lego from ~2-12. Overall, she must have collected thousands of Euros of Lego from birthday, Christmas, and Sinterklaas presents. When friends were over, they usually wanted to play with Lego.
Us older people who remember the days of Lego without franchises and a focus on your own creativity/imagination might be grumpy about modern Lego (though they have been good at making adult Lego sets as well). But Lego is still wildly successful because they found ways to connect with younger generations and the franchise-based Minecraft/DC Comics/Star Wars/Harry Potter/etc. Lego is exactly one of the ways they have managed to do this, along with Lego for specific focus groups (e.g. Lego Friends).
cowlevel 40 minutes ago | parent
deadbabe 13 minutes ago | parent
bwnkl 1 hour ago | parent
suboto 1 hour ago | parent
cowlevel 42 minutes ago | parent
Ylpertnodi 20 minutes ago | parent
rckclmbr 29 minutes ago | parent
ChrisMarshallNY 36 minutes ago | parent
crabique 27 minutes ago | parent
Sad to see Daft Punk smear their legacy with a thick coat of dog shit lately, but I guess money is money after all, and this new low won't be the lowest for very long.
excalibur 10 minutes ago | parent
alexwy 5 minutes ago | parent
Lego could have chosen a BOOST reboot and incorporated Daft Punk samples, they could have chosen a working 808, they could have a Vidiyo set, and instead it's just a model that sits quietly and gathers dust.
For me, part of being a Daft Punk fan was digging into the creativity behind their music. I think it's why they worked so hard to build an entire song around Giorgio Moroder and the potential to do anything with music. Did they do that just to fill a track or was it an intentional passing of the torch to the audience? I would like to believe it was the latter.
A Lego set collab with Daft Punk that does not challenge the 'player' to create something new (and especially to create music) is just an awful waste.