18 points mikelgan 1 hour ago 11 comments
benoau 1 hour ago | parent
Somewhere amongst this was a great opportunity for reducing consumption of electricity from dirty sources, mass-optimizing millions of thermostats, car and electric bikes/etc charging, refrigerators, computer power settings etc to reduce emissions... but now it sounds like it should be illegal.
superb_dev 56 minutes ago | parent
aDyslecticCrow 50 minutes ago | parent
It's pretty good! The need came from the high variability of wind power. Less dystopian than ... data centers... urgh.
It's of course optional. If you optimise well you can beat the monthly or daily tables and save quite a bit. If you don't care; you pay whatever the grid operator estimates.
stvltvs 32 minutes ago | parent
Vaushite 1 hour ago | parent
Edit: why is this comment suddenly grounds for an auto shadowban??????
Jtsummers 55 minutes ago | parent
Your previous comment was the one that first got auto killed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50216326
I don't know why it was. Reach out to the mods (contact link at the bottom of the page), asking the question here won't get you an answer.
BLKNSLVR 1 hour ago | parent
It's a sad, but true, indictment about how scaled humanity works.
bagacrap 19 minutes ago | parent
mikestorrent 57 minutes ago | parent
I have heard of efforts to link thermostats etc. with this virtual power plant idea so that when there is an energy demand one's home appliances stop working so hard and use less energy. This of course could lead to hot/cold houses for people, so there must always be the option to manually override if the discomfort is a problem. So many of these efforts come from e.g. California... other places in the world have wider weather extremes to worry about!
Izikiel43 53 minutes ago | parent
Basically, you get solar and battery, and google gets the excess power.
gnabgib 27 minutes ago | parent
Origin 5 months ago Google and Voltus sign agreement for smart energy capacity (3 points) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48371484