13 points NaOH 2 days ago 6 comments

jerrysievert 1 hour ago | parent

just the amount of change for ww2 alone is amazing, having moved from biplanes to jets in such a short period of time.

WesleyLivesay 1 hour ago | parent

Literally from sticks and canvas to jets in a few decades.

projectileboy 1 hour ago | parent

If you like this, strongly recommend you check out the National Museum of the US Air Force at Wright-Patterson AFB near Dayton, Ohio. They have everything you can imagine. https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/

WesleyLivesay 1 hour ago | parent

No clue why this is on the HN homepage, but I love aviation museums. It is so difficult to feel scale with aircraft due to the fact that most of the images are of them flying and so there is no context. Seeing them in person can really help put them in perspective.

krelian87 31 minutes ago | parent

I also suggest the italian air force museum near Rome. https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/home/storia-e-tradizione/m... (use italian version for the virtual tour, in the english version it's broken, typical italian public administration website, sorry folks).

Onavo 9 minutes ago | parent

I wonder which planes from that era are "nice to fly" by modern standards. As a point of reference, the Cessna 172 trainer originates from the C170 which was designed right after World War 2. It's an extremely forgiving and well designed plane.

People like to say that the tech industry is young but most of general aviation is only a few steps removed from the early days of Wright Brothers and their contemporaries like Dumont and Blériot.

It's a pity that clean sheet designs of airplanes made from composites (most famously your Diamonds and Cirruses) are dreadfully expensive to maintain relative to the old school aluminium frame designs. The composite (carbon fiber polymers) airframes have way better aerodynamic characteristics and benefit a lot more from the past 50 years of aerodynamic advances. Though given the fact that modern EVs have very aerodynamic external aluminium shells, I wonder if some of the limitations of shaping aluminium into complex aerodynamic shapes have been resolved (composites are much simpler to shape, they are basically fabric version of 3D printing)