19 points jacquesm 1 hour ago 12 comments

hp197 1 hour ago | parent

this already is a 20yo site or so. why the hype today?

johnea 1 hour ago | parent

When is it time to run a world class time reference in your basement?

For time nuts, it's always time...

If you don't get it, then, you just don't get it...

alnwlsn 1 hour ago | parent

It was just the correct time.

TYPE_FASTER 1 hour ago | parent

I mean, time really is a tough nut to crack.

dang 1 hour ago | parent

Historical material is always welcome on HN! We try to optiize for intellectual curiosity, not novelty.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor...

happytoexplain 1 hour ago | parent

Is this going around in other places today, or does posting something to HN qualify as "hype"?

gpvos 4 minutes ago | parent

With the recent abolition of the leap second, this is as good a time as any.

VladVladikoff 1 hour ago | parent

SSL error when loading this site?

jacquesm 1 hour ago | parent

They got stuck in time ;) Port 80 exclusively.

aftbit 51 minutes ago | parent

There's a lot of interesting stuff in the time-nut world. There's a fun mailing list at https://time-nuts.febo.narkive.com/ and Jeff Geerling has been doing a lot of stuff with clocks lately on YouTube. An interesting intro project is to set up a GPSDO and track the long-term aging of an OXCO or Rubidium standard (many of which are surplused out of telecom applications for somewhat reasonable prices on eBay).

Also vaguely related, the precision clock kit by Mitxela - https://mitxela.com/shop/clock4

Then there's the EFOS3 Hydrogen Maser by https://www.efos3.com/

There is a very deep rabbithole in here.

jacquesm 35 minutes ago | parent

So, I originally posted this a while back when I was hip-deep in nano-second level time measurement and learning every day how little I knew about this field. We all take for granted that there are a billion nano seconds in a second and that in theory you can count those one-by-one if you have a precise enough oscillator but to actually have stability good enough to track the effects of sub-cycle changes to radio signals (phase changes) is not all that simple. Especially when the measurements themselves run over a day or more.

I eventually got it all to work 'in the lab' but nowhere near stable or accurate enough for a real life application. This was all done at very low radio frequencies with super low radiated power (under the license limits) and that of course complicated matters greatly.

The big game changer was to get hold of an atomic clock that I could run locally. That takes the sting out of synchronizing with external sources and using a relatively affordable SDR I was finally able to do this with enough precision to be able to differentiate between the ground conducted signal and the 'airwave' for one of the EU atomic clocks (DCF-77). It was really neat to see the effect of the day/night cycle on the propagation of the signal (exactly as predicted) as validation.

helterskelter2 17 minutes ago | parent

Thank you! I've had the idea of aquiring an atomic clock in the back of my head for a while now and I'm glad to see there's a like-minded community out there. I'm not even sure what I'd do with it except measure time dilation effects.