118 points eustoria 2 hours ago 69 comments
BLKNSLVR 2 hours ago | parent
hmokiguess 2 hours ago | parent
AdmiralAsshat 2 hours ago | parent
yoavm 2 hours ago | parent
hmokiguess 2 hours ago | parent
what you're saying, if I understand correctly, is that self-hosting this is trivial then
so does that mean I could run my own local instance and never get it taken down since traffic would be negligible? why do people opt to host these for others over teaching how to run your own for example?
fcarraldo 1 hour ago | parent
Every individual running their own instance would be the equivalent of every individual having their own Twitter account, which defeats the purpose.
cassianoleal 1 hour ago | parent
causesothere 1 hour ago | parent
pamcake 1 hour ago | parent
Yes. It comes encouraged.
> so does that mean I could run my own local instance and never get it taken down since traffic would be negligible?
Yes, unless the other end forbids it and really cares about controlling clients. If they do and manage to detect that you are using alternative client they could block based on that. In times where that happens and there are client devs who care, it becomes a cat-and-mouse.
Vaushite 37 minutes ago | parent
grimgrin 2 hours ago | parent
many working instances right now: https://codeberg.org/shitter/shitter/wiki/Instances
zImPatrick 22 minutes ago | parent
assimpleaspossi 1 hour ago | parent
valicord 1 hour ago | parent
assimpleaspossi 1 hour ago | parent
satvikpendem 1 hour ago | parent
causesothere 1 hour ago | parent
Maybe your cultural values aren't my cultural values. Maybe you need to consider who you are excluding by suggesting that using a curse word is unacceptable?
Cursing has a long tradition in lower economic class culture, in some minority cultures, in queer culture, heck in mainstream cultures worldwide we say "shit", etc. You want them all to conform to your one view of how professionals should be? The curse word isn't directed at you, it isn't directed at anyone you know, or even at a person.
No, I think maybe I'd rather live in a world where people are colorful, use language that's authentic to them, and include more people in the dialog.
es1kl 1 hour ago | parent
assimpleaspossi 1 hour ago | parent
I am. Thus the complaint. I would think the general audience here is of a higher caliber than low-class cultures whose values and education can't rise above profanity.
causesothere 1 hour ago | parent
krapp 1 hour ago | parent
My person in deity "enshittification" is a technical term of art around here, and "Gimp" is both a popular graphics software and a sexual fetish term.
No one besides children and people with low emotional IQ care about such things.
causesothere 1 hour ago | parent
BigTTYGothGF 39 minutes ago | parent
By and large the hacker news moderators and commentariat have demonstrated that they do not welcome those cultures here.
causesothere 36 minutes ago | parent
jimmydoe 1 hour ago | parent
SomeonesAccount 1 hour ago | parent
DavCreator 1 hour ago | parent
Example: https://shitter.thepixora.com/search?f=tweets&q=elon+musk
Wont show any pictures in Firefox for me. Works in Chrome. Can this be fixed? Thank you!
moopie 1 hour ago | parent
add-sub-mul-div 1 hour ago | parent
afpx 1 hour ago | parent
0c3ca83 57 minutes ago | parent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_activities_of_Elon_M...
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/17/opinion/elon-musk-republi...
https://ecfr.eu/article/musks-war-on-european-democracy-how-...
https://apnews.com/article/elon-musk-x-influence-uk-us-polit...
Hope that helps.
stronglikedan 55 minutes ago | parent
smith7018 54 minutes ago | parent
moomin 43 minutes ago | parent
sureMan6 35 minutes ago | parent
Bluesky is founded by the same founders of Twitter and is not open and has ridiculous policies, Mastodon is the same, even less popular and even more tyrannical
So the choice for most users, including myself, is tightly moderated spaces run by awful people, or a website run by a literal Nazi, but that at least doesn't ban me on sight
The Musk twitter acquisition (and the sieg heil at the inauguration) were pivotal moments where a good alternative could've surfaced but instead we got twitter 2.0 (and moving from Twitter to Twitter 2 seems entirely pointless even if it wasn't badly moderated on top of that)
Philpax 14 minutes ago | parent
Huh? It is remarkably open and the policies are not really an issue.
wolvoleo 5 minutes ago | parent
jjulius 32 minutes ago | parent
... so? Being linked to it is not an obligation to bother with it, neither is FOMO.
strideashort 31 minutes ago | parent
Seriously, we have a problem labeling anything not left “far right”. It is of course by design and has always been (who is not with us is against us). Not that right is any better, but at list they don’t label everyone across “antifa” or whatever.
That said, i do not endorse Musk, especially his infamous gesture.
Steltek 12 minutes ago | parent
The "left" spans such a huge range right now that to be "not left" is basically far right. A Republican opposing Trump is _extremely_ rare (and usually excommunicates them from the party) while on the left, you have AOC, Omar, etc actively sharing a party with Fetterman and Manchin. Right/far-right was a thing in the 2010's but not any more.
numpad0 26 minutes ago | parent
There's some likely made up charts online[1] for country stats of Twitter right now, and Twitter is allegedly 2.5x more popular than it is in the US in the top two countries, which are incidentally known for strong-ish purchasing power and near-nonexistent English literacy.
Musk's ongoing massive self humiliation is largely contained to the US/English speaking space. Other parts of the world with no strong cultural understandings and pathways from the US and its politics, which is quite substantial still, are fine, ish. Things like LLM auto translation haven't made a change to that situation; it only strengthened the reverse of that pathway.
Markoff 19 minutes ago | parent
hagbard_c 10 minutes ago | parent
nine_k 1 hour ago | parent