109 points teekert 1 hour ago 52 comments
klappgrt 1 hour ago | parent
terabytest 1 hour ago | parent
Roxo 1 hour ago | parent
Tryvrsakjo10 1 hour ago | parent
thatsabadlook 1 hour ago | parent
Our now former allies aren't making this public to smear some guy they met at a party they don't like. They are warning the world that the us is an oligarchy and rule of law is dead.
pacifika 1 hour ago | parent
fabian2k 1 hour ago | parent
blooalien 49 minutes ago | parent
Hasn't that already been the case for a while now though? Seems like you get in trouble with the law, you gotta prove your innocence, and you're treated as guilty until you do (and suffer some consequences still even after proving your innocence, just for having been "in the system" in that way).
Worse yet, the "media" these days gets away with bloody murder compared to the way things used to be before the Internet. It's all about maximum outrage and division these days, because that "engagement" is what sells advertising space. Convicted by the media is almost as bad as convicted by the "Justice" system. Either one can totally ruin lives.
lkey 37 minutes ago | parent
These are the people that gave us: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarring_and_feathering after all.
It is strange though that you are lamenting this state of affairs for Jared Kushner, of all people. He will be pardoned, and will not lack for invites to New York soirees just because he took bribes from blood-soaked US allies.
I mean this sincerely, what prompted you to comment on this case?
lkey 49 minutes ago | parent
A [free, or discounted] pardon awaits every member of the trump family.
KaiserPro 1 hour ago | parent
If he's telling the truth, then I would do the same.
If he's lying, then it might work, I would also probably do the same.
The interesting thing here is that two publications allowed the journalist to call Kushner "corrupt". This means that the lawyers would have seen compelling evidence that would mean one of two things:
1) Kushner wouldn't take them to court, because he would have to settle out of court in an expensive way
2) Kushner, if he were to take court action, would not win civil case.
This leads me to think that there is more than a shred of evidence, but an awful lot of evidence that he didn't declare what he was supposed to (at best) and at worse laundered foreign cash for his own purposes
roenxi 47 minutes ago | parent
Although it is always possible that they've got something worth saying it is also entirely possible that they're just making up a story out of nothing.
enoint 34 minutes ago | parent
kasey_junk 31 minutes ago | parent
Rather than moving on from this the Pulitzer Board is vigorously defending their decision in court as we speak.
There certainly hasn’t been a retraction. You’ll also note Trump never sued the papers over their coverage.
ModernMech 11 minutes ago | parent
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50194105
In short, the facts are:
- Trump's campaign met repeatedly with Russians and lied about it.
- Trump's inner circle took meetings with a Russian spy in hopes of getting dirt and lied about it.
- Russia actually did release dirt to help Trump campaign and lied about it.
- Trump's campaign eagerly accepted that help and asked for more publicly, and Russia obliged.
- Trump's campaign shared internal campaign data with Russian intelligence officers.
- If they could have exonerated Trump they would have, but they couldn't.
These are cold hard facts available in the mueller report and the senate intel committee report, both authored by Republicans.
wewxjfq 8 minutes ago | parent
thatsabadlook 1 hour ago | parent
amelius 1 hour ago | parent
233mhz 1 hour ago | parent
blooalien 57 minutes ago | parent
verdverm 2 minutes ago | parent
I'm on the ground and the conversations are changing. There is significant damage that will take decades to repair, but I do not think it impossible.
We broke the trust with allies on so many levels and you should continue to hedge, because America might not be peaking on absurdity yet...
TrackerFF 1 hour ago | parent
In any case, Kushner - and rightfully so - could not obtain a security clearance the first time around, due to massive debt. But it was overruled / waived by higher ups.
I've worked in intel, and Kushner seems like the textbook example - a cautionary tale - on the type of person you do not want to grant anything of importance.
Honestly it sort of blows my mind that the US has a system decisions by security professionals can simply be overruled.
didroe 50 minutes ago | parent
Tade0 8 minutes ago | parent
verdverm 6 minutes ago | parent
America will need a number of constitutional amendments to counter the last 40+ years, which I hope is peaking this administration.
teekert 49 minutes ago | parent
Came across it here [1]: "Per Executive Order 14434, federal agencies are now using "Super Intelligence" (SI) in place of "Artificial Intelligence" (AI). You may see both terms across NIH content during this transition."
[0] https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/09/inau...
spiderfarmer 3 minutes ago | parent
It's like trying to make "fetch" happen by executive order.
chinathrow 44 minutes ago | parent
And copy paste of the above for Trump.
kergonath 7 minutes ago | parent
dudisubekti 33 minutes ago | parent
Isn't that kinda bad for their health? Polonium intake is unhealthy.
I'm not an American so don't take this the wrong way, but Jared's response to the tweet, that the story is fabricated because of how complicated it is and VanityFair disclosed no evidences, should be considered as well.
Tade0 19 minutes ago | parent
I believe the current modus operandi is to offer a window.
On a serious note: plenty of people were surprised that Navalny returned to Russia. I suspect that after his poisoning it became clear Putin and his cronies wanted him dead, so he chose to give them the judicial spectacle they wanted so that they would at least spare his family.
mosura 26 minutes ago | parent
Dutch intel can think that happened, or not. It is independent from if that is true. The whole thing equally sounds like a setup using the Dutch to launder the story.
Which is also entirely independent from any stories of this sort in the media being true one way or another.
dzogchen 59 minutes ago | parent
secondcoming 49 minutes ago | parent
I recall they helped the UK during the Falklands War with SIGINT/cryptanalytic stuff
microtonal 29 minutes ago | parent
In 2019, it was reported that an Iranian mole working for Dutch intelligence at the behest of Israel and the CIA inserted the Stuxnet virus with a USB flash drive or convinced another person working at the Natanz facility to do so.
carschno 40 minutes ago | parent
MadrasTh0rn 38 minutes ago | parent
BatteryMountain 37 minutes ago | parent
DivingForGold 23 minutes ago | parent
https://wallhop.io/https://www.vanityfair.com/story/jared-ku...
teekert 6 minutes ago | parent
CodeCompost 6 minutes ago | parent
shin_lao 10 minutes ago | parent
tclancy 6 minutes ago | parent
“Kushner’s counsel, however, said Kushner did not make any agreements or arrangements with leaders or officials in foreign countries that were not agreed to by the President of the United States and in the best interests of the United States.”
This is all categorically untrue and besides, I had permission.ck2 5 minutes ago | parent