67 points throwa356262 2 hours ago 31 comments
throwa356262 2 hours ago | parent
This is great for Anthropic, but who is increasing their AI spending in this climate?
shakna 2 hours ago | parent
Microsoft, SK Group, Meta, Google, Oracle, etc.
skrtskrt 1 hour ago | parent
That would very much not be great for Anthropic, they need to be accelerating growth to keep valuation, doubly so as interest rates on corporate bonds continue to rise.
dgellow 20 minutes ago | parent
xvxvx 2 hours ago | parent
saidnooneever 1 hour ago | parent
they are obviously a con ( opinion). look at last slop report. opus 5.5 gets _worse_ when u put higher attention settings. u get banned for using better harnesses etc. etc.
they could do really well. a lot of avid supporters. But i think if they do not change their tactics then openAI, GLM for those who can run it, or others, might start taking even those (pardon my french) religious fans.
0cf8612b2e1e 2 hours ago | parent
Reuters reported first in September that Anthropic posted a net loss of $42 billion in 2025 and plans to spend $518 billion on cloud, computing and infrastructure obligations in coming years.
$16B revenue and hoping to spend $500B in the coming years.kolinko 1 hour ago | parent
It is actually faring much better than other tech startups ipo’ing over the last 20 years.
MisterMunchkin 1 hour ago | parent
sigmar 1 hour ago | parent
ostracoda 2 hours ago | parent
psygn89 1 hour ago | parent
karp773 30 minutes ago | parent
This reminds we the famous (although unproven) "640K ought to be enough for anybody."
Gigachad 12 minutes ago | parent
dctwin 1 hour ago | parent
aurareturn 1 hour ago | parent
dannykwells 1 hour ago | parent
The overwhelming majority of the net loss in the first half of this year, $72 billion, resulted from accounting charges linked to changes in the value of convertible notes and other instruments Anthropic has issued, according to the report.
So this is really just capped notes converting. Total nothing burger.
FloorEgg 37 minutes ago | parent
Hmmm...
My advice: if you actually want to know the truth of what is going on, get a general understanding of finance and read the actual financial statements/filings and their disclaimers. It's very easy to write articles like this that cherry pick certain numbers out of context to support a specific narrative. Reuters is in the process of liquidating their reputation in the same way that forbes and business insider and many others publications have.
gonzalohm 10 minutes ago | parent
tim333 28 minutes ago | parent
The other $72 billion was non-cash adjustment.
Revenue was $16.3 billion for H1 2026, up from $1.1 billion for H1 2025.
Not actually that bad.
quicklywilliam 26 minutes ago | parent
Interesting, would love to know the details of this.
simonw 22 minutes ago | parent
Does that mean they lost $8bn in actual cash? I'm trying to understand how that matches up to their earlier reported claims that Q2 and Q3 were "profitable".
(Oh wait, this $80bn loss is reported for "the first half" of 2026, so it's not including the supposedly profitable Q3.)