271 points AshleysBrain 1 hour ago 179 comments

ChrisArchitect 1 hour ago | parent

late 2025: Facebook tests £9.99 monthly subscription for sharing more than two links https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46314668

superkuh 1 hour ago | parent

On Google's Youtube to post links (like in video descriptions, etc) you have to pay by adding sellable/monetarily valuable personally identifying information to your account like a phone number and ID. Otherwise even with a google account from 2006 in good standing you can't post links anymore. Attempts to edit old video descriptions with HTTP/S links (from before the policy) also don't work.

idiotsecant 1 hour ago | parent

I'm not sure a phone number is particularly valuable. It is a decent way pretty much ensure that you aren't a bot, though.

DataDaemon 1 hour ago | parent

They just want kill small web and keep people on their platforms.

sirnicolaz 1 hour ago | parent

So happy. All the fake news will cost much more now. Best case: less shit-links going around. Best case 2: Facebook closes down. No worst case.

Kim_Bruning 1 hour ago | parent

Presumably this is an A/B test? I don't see how that's remotely sustainable

mondobe 1 hour ago | parent

LinkedIn has seriously deranked posts with links in the past. Everything within Meta is heavily A/B tested, but it seems feasible that this will become real.

bigbuppo 1 hour ago | parent

Remember how Sears was a thing but they kept making dumb decisions and were also unable to adapt to new realities? Facebook/Meta is like that. Doomed company walking.

AndrewKemendo 1 hour ago | parent

Agreed, they are eating the seed corn with this one

apercu 1 hour ago | parent

One can hope.

grumpopotamus 1 hour ago | parent

Sometimes I have thoughts like this, but then I get on the subway and watch everyone around me endlessly scroll Instagram while their brains melt out their ears, and then I decide that I was the one who was out of touch.

ruszki 50 minutes ago | parent

History tells us that a large portion of the population can be out of touch. Sometimes almost everybody in a given society.

unnamed76ri 40 minutes ago | parent

I’d agree except most over the age of 45-50 will never leave FB for other platforms. They’ve got decades of milking money out of that cow before it dies completely

Doohickey-d 40 minutes ago | parent

Instagram already does charge for outgoing links, so I would assume that they found that they can sustainably make money with it there, and that it should work on FB too.

mightyham 1 hour ago | parent

Is this not a good idea? It makes average users more selective about what content they are sharing, and reduces scam/bot content that can currently spam post links for free.

cma 1 hour ago | parent

If it is for that reason and not a money squeezing/enshittification thing, it seems like a big admission their feed algorithm doesn't work.

magicalist 1 hour ago | parent

This is for Facebook Pages, not for users. Average facebook daily user can keep posting 35 links a day to their favorite slop site.

bluGill 1 hour ago | parent

Those 35 links to "you wouldn't believe which politician wants to kill our kids now" type posts are why I quit facebook. There is value in know what my friends are doing, but the negative value of that hate isn't worth it.

Ajedi32 1 hour ago | parent

I wish there were a way to filter links and reshares out of my feed completely.

afavour 1 hour ago | parent

Very few spam/scam posts I see rely on external links. FB is an all in one scammers paradise. This just seems like a transparent attempt to keep people on platform.

NicuCalcea 1 hour ago | parent

Facebook actively courted publishers so they'd post links to their content on their pages. Now they want to charge them for the privilege.

jimbokun 16 minutes ago | parent

First hit’s free.

SwellJoe 59 minutes ago | parent

Facebook knows what you want to see, because you can follow pages and individuals. They choose to show those scam/bot posts to you anyway. This isn't to fight bots.

josefresco 1 hour ago | parent

As someone who helps small businesses create their own websites... thank you Facebook! Seriously though, back when "Facebook Pages instead of websites" were all the rage, FB demoting page content in feeds officially killed that movement and I was similarly happy.

iugtmkbdfil834 15 minutes ago | parent

It is an interesting move, because deploying a viable website has never been easier. FB had an advantage on default reach, but even that is slowly becoming a question as younger generations use it less.

jstummbillig 1 hour ago | parent

Those free and open models though

TrackerFF 1 hour ago | parent

Guess it's a tactic to go after bots and scammers?

geoffschmidt 49 minutes ago | parent

It's a tactic, the only the latest of many, to go after people who use Facebook to communicate without paying for ads (that is to say - without paying current auction prices for the attention of the recipients of their messages.)

celsoazevedo 20 minutes ago | parent

Isn't it funny that every change to "protect users" ends up with you paying Facebook more to reach the people that followed your page?

I still remember when Facebook Pages were promoted as an alternative to feeds and newsletters. You could follow a page and be sure to receive all updates from them. Now you even have to pay to share links.

writtenone 1 hour ago | parent

Timshel 1 hour ago | parent

I love that they specified that links in ads do not count

rcr-anti 1 hour ago | parent

I hate to devil's advocate this. But is the observed behavior of 'is this an outgoing link' the only practical way to defend against external bot advertising campaigns? Aside from Facebook obviously wanting you to pay them for advertising, how does any independent forum deal with this at scale without banning links?

SwellJoe 1 hour ago | parent

"how does any independent forum deal with this at scale without banning links?"

By banning spammers and scammers. Facebook opts not to ban scammers, as it's a significant portion of their revenue, and the latest AI slop is very good for engagement.

ok123456 8 minutes ago | parent

So you have to pay a small amount of money to keep running your criminal enterprise? This would slightly raise the cost of doing business. Scams and banned goods already account for 10% of "Meta" revenues [1]. This move acknowledges that reality and creates a new rent-seeking behavior around it.

https://www.reuters.com/investigations/meta-is-earning-fortu...

wg0 1 hour ago | parent

This is last stage capitalism of these tech platforms.

Nothing much left to innovate.

tapland 1 hour ago | parent

This can't be sustainable.

The few groups I'm in, local wildlife and pet bird groups, mainly consist of people asking questions that need to and are usually answered by posting links to local resources or regulations.

biker142541 53 minutes ago | parent

Yep, it will basically mean the death of Facebook. I don’t use it much, but the groups I’m in are for sharing local events (usually link to library page, map for meetup location, etc). Without links, those groups go away.

woadwarrior01 48 minutes ago | parent

Perhaps share QR codes with links. :)

criddell 45 minutes ago | parent

Since links within Meta are free, maybe they are hoping you will bring all the external resources into some Meta property?

billyp-rva 13 minutes ago | parent

Probably. Their aim has always been to colonize the entire web.

codingisfreedom 1 hour ago | parent

I seriously can’t understand why there’s so much respect for anyone that works at Meta.

These people have arguably contributed nothing to society for over a decade (and maybe even made it worse in some instances) for very fat salaries, and yet they’re being praised for being the example of best engineers.

I periodically use their websites and they’re horrible!

Seriously, we should know better as the dev-tech society.

And I don’t give a darn about their research that is being built on top of barely legal mass surveillance so don’t tell me their contributions from stealing data were helpful.

probably_wrong 1 hour ago | parent

I have some respect for Meta Research for the good they did releasing Torch, FastText vectors, and the LLaMa models among others for free.

How does this work fits with their mission of destroying the fabric of society and the mental well-being of teenagers, I cannot explain.

gilrain 1 hour ago | parent

> I have some respect ... I cannot explain.

Naturally, they do it to earn "some respect" from those who otherwise see them clearly.

functionmouse 59 minutes ago | parent

wasn't LLaMa only open source because it had already leaked anyways? And they wanted to spin it in a positive light for their stakeholders.

A_D_E_P_T 49 minutes ago | parent

It opened the floodgates, though. It was a real paradigm shift. After LLaMa, everybody saw that you could release large open models without any negative repercussions, and DeepSeek et al. hopped aboard the wagon. LLaMa was the first popular model that was truly open to the global public.

Meta earned a ton of goodwill by doing this -- it was very brave, and very influential. In my eyes, it outweighs everything negative they've ever done.

latexr 46 minutes ago | parent

> it was very brave, and very influential. In my eyes, it outweighs everything negative they've ever done.

Are you being sarcastic? Please let it be that you’re being sarcastic.

alerighi 36 minutes ago | parent

Let's stop saying that open weight models are open source. They are just a software that you can run on your own hardware (if you have a ton of money to spend to get it anyway) but they are not open, they are as open as any proprietary software that you can run on your PC is.

You can't study them, you can't modify them, you can't improve them, you can't look into how they are built etc.

boothby 56 minutes ago | parent

Similar to how Vanderbilt, Rockefeller, etc. used tiny fractions of their wealth, on things that would bolster the opinions of the public. They’re laudable, but become less so when you see the bigger picture. Those free software tools are things that Meta needs for its own operations, and their moat is so vast that they can give them away for free and benefit from public participation.

cromka 50 minutes ago | parent

ZSTD as well.

latexr 48 minutes ago | parent

> their mission of destroying the fabric of society and the mental well-being of teenagers

Their mission is to make Zuckerberg rich and powerful. That’s the sole purpose of Meta, everything else is incidental. It just so happens that they also destroy the fabric of society and the mental well-being of teenagers but it’s not their primary goal, they just don’t care about the side effect. It would be all the same if they were poisoning coral reefs and giving wedgies to grandmothers instead. As long as the process benefits Zuckerberg in the end, nothing else matters to the company.

wildzzz 44 minutes ago | parent

It's like the best of the best mechanical and electrical engineers have teamed up to build the world's most efficient orphan crushing machine. It sips power, runs cool, requires almost no maintenance, and pulverizes orphans into dense little cubes for easy clean up.

philipallstar 30 minutes ago | parent

You've got to justify such a silly comparison.

Applejinx 25 minutes ago | parent

Agreed, it takes a lot more power and doesn't run nearly as cool as all that.

crest 17 minutes ago | parent

The orphan crushing machine is a meme (https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/orphan-crushing-machine). Most of Meta's products hurt society from driving impressionable young girls into an early grave, over supporting genocide and ethnic cleansing, to splitting voters into rabid fans with blind devotion on "their team" over everything else.

They also work hard to force users into their walled gardens and to stop the useful content users to this day feed into they intentionally broken services from escaping into the real world wide web of hyperlinked and discoverable content.

In short they're at the forefront of making the internet harmful to society and less useful to almost everyone.

crest 29 minutes ago | parent

Also it has a glorious viewing gallery to watch and listen to a thousand doomed orphans get fed to Zuckerberg’s ego so it can illuminate the path to total enshittification.

aaronrobinson 25 minutes ago | parent

> It's like the best of the best mechanical and electrical engineers have teamed up to build the world's most efficient orphan crushing machine.

This is the funniest thing I’ve read on here.

Alifatisk 1 hour ago | parent

> These people have arguably contributed nothing to society for over a decade […] they’re being praised for being the example of best engineers.

React? We can all criticize it, but it has revolutionized the web. Llama. Did you forget what sparked the whole open-weight wave? It was that. I dislike Meta, but I would not criticize the engineers competence. They have done impressive things, check out their blog if you genuinely are curious.

soperj 1 hour ago | parent

> revolutionized the web

Personally I hate what react has done to the web.

mahboi 58 minutes ago | parent

Angular would've done the same thing but more poorly

dsauerbrun 58 minutes ago | parent

what is react responsible for? If you're referring to the explosion of SPAs, I think you should direct your blame to angularjs... React was just a better version of that revolution.

calebio 55 minutes ago | parent

Agreed. React, imo, was a much better Backbone.js. Relatively lightweight primitives, composition, and JSX made building frontend applications fun without having to wire up everything by hand.

__MatrixMan__ 37 minutes ago | parent

Did the makers of anuglarjs also have a conflict of interest? Or did they ruin the web just for the love of the game?

thesuitonym 49 minutes ago | parent

React was over a decade ago.

adamnemecek 40 minutes ago | parent

React is kinda shit.

alerighi 34 minutes ago | parent

React ruined the web, and the mobile development too.

Now to load a simple website that in the past was a few kB of HTML, CSS and JS you need to download Mb of JS code. Now the browser needs to use Mb of RAM just to display a stupid webpage.

For what? It was better when we had PHP pages that did produce HTML on the server side.

Another thing to me that we have to get Meta discredit for, not something good in any way.

hnlmorg 27 minutes ago | parent

The web was broken long before React came along. Or have you forgotten about Angular, incompatibilities between JS engines that required hacks like jQuery, the Internet Explorer monopoly, and those who gave up on the stagnating specifications from w3c entirely so wrote their sites in Flash? Or worse, JavaApplets. Or even worse yet, ActiveX (it took a decade for South Korea to undo that latter mistake)

DonHopkins 29 minutes ago | parent

Did you ever have one of those days when React doesn't, variables don't, and constants aren't?

For how unoriginal, unreactive, and mind-numbingly iterative over virtual DOM React is, it should be named Repeat.

"Things seem to hang on in computing just because they work a little bit." -Alan Kay

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8841428

Alan Kay also said this about his famous "Point of View is worth 80 IQ points" quote, which I think poignantly explains why React costs a net of 160 IQ points compared to Svelte:

>I have been keeping to "80" IQ points in the saying (thus avoiding inflation). However very few people have noticed there is no sign bit in the aphorism, and that it works just as well for "poor perspectives being worth negative 80 IQ points" (and I think we could claim inflation of stupidity in many bad directions these days ...).

Rich Harris: Rethinking Reactivity:

https://svelte.dev/blog/svelte-3-rethinking-reactivity

>There are some important technical differences (as I explain in the video above, React is not reactive) but conceptually it’s the same thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdNJ3fydeao

blazing234 23 minutes ago | parent

React did not revolutionize the web. The fuck are you talking about?

thinkingtoilet 55 minutes ago | parent

Society basically says money = good. God forbid we treat a sex worker with respect but if you're precious little Johnny works at Facebook finding new and exciting ways to get teenagers even more addicted to their phones it's all good because he makes a lot of money and money = good.

gunslinger_meta 43 minutes ago | parent

There are tons of sex workers that rake in money that even FAANG engineers will never see in 10 lives (e.g OF 'models'). I doubt much of society has any respect for them though.

bad_haircut72 32 minutes ago | parent

I dont think OF models are some paragon of virtue but theyre leagues ahead of engineers who choose to work at Meta

gunslinger_meta 28 minutes ago | parent

I agree, what I'm arguing is that money != respect as the parent asserted.

hnfong 31 minutes ago | parent

I've heard that millions of girls wanting to get rich look up to those "OF models" as role models.

Pretty much in the same way that a significant number of people in tech who wants a good paying job looks up to people working for Zuckerberg.

blazing234 18 minutes ago | parent

I have more respect for only fans models then fellow software developers nowadays. At least only fans models produce something others find valuable. We don't provide anything valuable anymore.

__MatrixMan__ 33 minutes ago | parent

The sooner we get past scarcity-only economics the better. It probably made a lot of sense at one time but now it's killing us.

Taikonerd 53 minutes ago | parent

In a weird way, I'm kind of glad that they're ruining facebook.com.

Like, even in its heyday, it was such an attention trap, and it had very negative effects on the people who got addicted (especially teens).

But the site has gotten so much worse in the past couple years, and its brand is in the garbage. Maybe that's all for the best -- it was never really worth preserving.

yndoendo 33 minutes ago | parent

The issue is that small business still utilize them instead of paying for and maintaining a web site. Want to know our business ours, events, or when we close early ... facebook.

There needs to be an easy to use low-cost, possible also advertisement driven, alternative that business can latch to so more can leave facebook.

I actively refuse to support Meta and block all their domain names in case of clicking on a tiny URL that sends me to their site. It also helps block their analytics used by 3rd parties. I will forever be a sunk cost for them.

jimbokun 22 minutes ago | parent

Thank God the teens have healthier outlets now like TikTok!

NoGravitas 6 minutes ago | parent

TikTok was actually pretty good before Larry the Lawnmower bought it.

999900000999 53 minutes ago | parent

Getting paid half a million TC at Meta beats only making 150k as a DoD contractor.

You’re arguably a war criminal either way, might as well get top dollar.

criddell 50 minutes ago | parent

The salaries aren't based on contribution to society, they are based on contribution to Meta. Fat salaries come from fat contributions.

giancarlostoro 50 minutes ago | parent

> I seriously can’t understand why there’s so much respect for anyone that works at Meta.

Only because the longer you work there, probably the more you've been able to handle while you time there, but I don't really care if you worked at Meta or at Momandpop Software Corp down the road, I care about your personality and ability to learn and adapt, these are stronger signals of the types of devs I want to work with than anything else. I'd still consider you, but I might pass on you if I feel more confident about someone else.

thesuitonym 49 minutes ago | parent

> and yet they’re being praised for being the example of best engineers.

By whom? I haven't seen anyone say something positive about Meta or their employees for at least 15 years, unless you count people who were being paid to write PR articles.

v3ss0n 47 minutes ago | parent

PyTorch .. React ..

That two libraries already build Frontend and AI.

lgl 27 minutes ago | parent

Even being the creators of React still wasn't enough to fix their shitshow of a website with a bazillion anti-patterns and the worse, most annoying UX of all time.

And yes, I mean facebook.com

password54321 27 minutes ago | parent

There is nothing special about the engineering behind React. Success simply compounds, if big company X does something everyone else must do it, which leads to more contributors, which leads to more visibility.

smashah 41 minutes ago | parent

thank you for saying this. We have to bring back shaming in tech.

mnd999 33 minutes ago | parent

> and maybe even made it worse

I don’t think that’s a maybe. There’s actual research on social media addiction. For me, getting off Facebook improved my life.

qurren 33 minutes ago | parent

Okay so one of the reasons I post on Meta platforms less nowadays is that they often don't show my content to my own followers and friends. I'm tired of talking to walls. I'm tired of having communication between friends gatekept by a stupid algorithm. I'm fine with recommendation systems being used for things I DON'T subscribe to, but if it's between friends I want to see ALL of it.

So now it's "pay $50 to post 2 links" but does that guarantee them showing it to your followers and friends? If NOT -- is that sufficient reason for a fraud lawsuit?

ipozgaj 32 minutes ago | parent

> These people have arguably contributed nothing to society for over a decade

React, React Native, GraphQL, LLama, PyTorch, RocksDB, Cassandra, folly, Hack, HHVM, OCP, Presto, btrfs, cgroupsv2/PSI, eBPF, zstd, roughly 12% of all Linux kernel contributions are signed off by Meta + Meta is the 5th biggest contributor to Linux kernel.

Also a ton of other projects that did not originally come out of Meta but get a ton of patches and support/funding: MySQL, Memcached, Hadoop, LLVM, Systemd, Rust, Python etc.

Perhaps research a bit more before you make these ignorant comments.

blazing234 25 minutes ago | parent

I have no respect for React, React Native and GraphQL. They are all horrible and don't solve actual problems. They aren't even the best tools to accomplish what they're trying to accomplish.

I don't know anything about the other things so I can't say if they are good or not. But acting as if react is some big invention is crazy. bell Labs gave us Unix and C. Meta isn't even close to inventing something like that.

Henchman21 25 minutes ago | parent

How have any of those made the world inhabited by humans in any way better?

NoGravitas 9 minutes ago | parent

zstd is pretty good, but not so much better than the alternatives to justify any of Meta's harms. I like btrfs because it makes my backups simpler and faster, but I don't need it, and I'd happily go back to ext4 to be rid of Meta.

Bluescreenbuddy 25 minutes ago | parent

Some of that tech was developed over ten years ago

phatskat 24 minutes ago | parent

I can take a brief look at the social damage meta has done and say that, to me, none of those contributions are worth the pain that they have caused.

From the messed up self-image issues they instill on children to the hand they played - either intentionally or through pure ignorance - in ethnic cleansing, I couldn't care less about what they've done in the tech space when those commits are signed in blood.

iugtmkbdfil834 13 minutes ago | parent

Zstd is worth a lot of other's people's pain.

My subtle point is that there are a lot of real reasons to dislike Meta. No reason to have hate blind you..

tempestn 12 minutes ago | parent

That's fine, but the original question asked why people respect devs who work at Meta given they haven't contributed anything. (It didn't explicitly say devs, but when meta employees are getting respect around here, that's who's being discussed.) Your parent reply demonstrated that they have in fact contributed a lot, so there are obviously some accomplished developers working there.

It's certainly possible to see the company as a net negative for society while also recognizing those contributions. One could even argue that that could simultaneously be the case, while the net effects of some particular devs working there are positive.

brendoelfrendo 23 minutes ago | parent

I would trade React for a world without Facebook any day of the week.

saulpw 22 minutes ago | parent

Yawn, I've used none of these except Linux and I would expect that their Linux contributions have been self-serving and not made it better for regular users like me.

I mean, Hack? Who cares?

tempestn 8 minutes ago | parent

Is your sole measure of value whether you personally use a thing?

the__alchemist 10 minutes ago | parent

I will invert these: These are IMO not great software, but software that have name recognition because they were built and marketed by a giant company.

fasterik 31 minutes ago | parent

Facebook is one of the most successful products of all time. Billions of people use it because they get value out of it. You can raise all of the legitimate criticisms of Facebook that you want, and there are many, but saying they have contributed nothing to society is delusional.

hvb2 25 minutes ago | parent

If Facebook stopped working today, would anything happen? Besides people having a lot of new free time on on their hands?

fasterik 15 minutes ago | parent

Yes, people would seek out those services elsewhere because clearly there's a demand for them. I find this attitude very paternalistic. Why do you care how other people choose to spend their time? Is it the technology you don't like, or is it the people who choose to use it?

buriram 31 minutes ago | parent

Because they do Leetcode interview and the day to day work is to solve Leetcode problems.

Now tell me where else can I find such a company having that?

I only care about competitive programming and solve algorithm problem. Nothing else matter: I don't care about product, frontend, security, data pipeline, bla bla nonsense.

And by the way, $400k+ salary in cash and RSU please. No stock options, thank you.

blazing234 19 minutes ago | parent

Competitive programming is the funniest thing I've ever heard. Leetcode in an interview and I end the interview immediately because I know everyone I work with is probably a corporate bootlicker. Because who else would study something as useless as leetcode. People who grow up learning by rote love leetcode though because they just memorize the answers.

buriram 14 minutes ago | parent

To me, product management and product engineering are the corporate bootlicker. You spend all day long adjusting the pixels, taking tickets from customers who ask for things like "why is button red not green", "why this list is not sorted alphabetically", or "I want this field 30px higher, not lower".

And by the way, you fought through all of that for a $15k-20k ARR contract. Never again, thank you.

Oh, and the PMs are just drones sitting in a room doing nothing but talks and herding the engineers like chicken, and try to claim credits for all the work engineers do. Never met a competent PM in my life.

LPisGood 28 minutes ago | parent

In addition to all of their open source contributions, their ability to pay a ton of money and fun problems to solve led a lot of fantastic engineers to want to work there — especially before 2015.

jacquesm 27 minutes ago | parent

> These people have arguably contributed nothing to society for over a decade

Not as FB. But they have shipped a lot of useful stuff. That doesn't mean the company is suddenly great and all should be forgiven but there is some nuance here.

krisoft 26 minutes ago | parent

First of all, i don’t know why you are talking about engineers. This is a business decision, not an engineering one.

> I seriously can’t understand why there’s so much respect for anyone that works at Meta.

Is there? Thats new for me.

> yet they’re being praised for being the example of best engineers

Are they? I associate meta with the “move fast and break things” philosophy, not engineering excelence.

I’m sure there are some fine engineers there. But by and large it is just a big company with questionable ethics and lots of money.

mancerayder 26 minutes ago | parent

And yet Google isn't quite as rebuked. There's another thread on HN today about ads in google TV.

But from a technical perspective, Google breaks constantly. Here's one. On Pixel you could use Assistant to start a timer or open an application. For years. Then Gemini is forced (first opt in, then forced, as is the Google Way)- there's no way to turn off voice out loud response, and opening apps - the most basic thing - doesn't work.

Then you have long-standing headaches like Gmail interface, reports of people's businesses getting blocked on Google Workspace, etc.

Facebook is blamed for that data broker scandal and making us hate our families due to political arguments. Google does all the same data broker stuff, and other than not being a forever scroll social media site, it's morally and technically repugnant.

blazing234 24 minutes ago | parent

The companies thought of having good engineers don't actually have good engineers. When there's a "prestige" with working somewhere it attracts the worst personalities in the field.

It ain't the same as the Bell Labs days. They try to larp as if they are the computer scientists of old but none of them are. They are just there for the salary and prestige and that's it.

yodsanklai 22 minutes ago | parent

People working at Meta tend to gravitate around the same group of tech companies who offer the same range of salaries, same selection process, same internal structure. Many of them aren't particularly brillant SWEs (in the sense you don't need to be an elite coder or top PhD), although they can deliver based on the evaluation processes in these companies.

Meta has a bad reputation in some circles, but I don't think there's anything peculiar or particularly evil about them, at least not worse than similar publicly traded big tech companies. They are amoral money-making entities.

That being said I agree that their products suck. I don't use them, besides what's app because it's difficult to avoid. It's also end to end encrypted so it doesn't really matter regarding mass surveillance.

roadside_picnic 9 minutes ago | parent

> for very fat salaries

For a fairly sizable portion of the population (especially the tech worker population), salary/TC is seen as the measure of someone's value as a human being. I've had acquaintances who really, sincerely struggled to understand the concept than an engineer making 1/N what an engineer at Meta/Google/etc does could be overall a better engineer. The typical reply has been something along the lines of "but if they're better, why don't they just make more money?"

They really couldn't understand when I tried to explain that, in my experience, nearly all the really brilliant and interesting technical people I knew tended to be making less, because they would rather work on interesting problems with a high degree of control than play leveling games at a large corporation.

Quitschquat 6 minutes ago | parent

I saw the best minds of my generation consumed by Adtech, starving hysterical naked

apt-get 1 hour ago | parent

World Wide Web, huh?

Those hyperlinks ain't free, you know.

10111001 1 hour ago | parent

They need to introduce postage for messages.

elevation 1 hour ago | parent

> World Wide Web

Embrace, extend, extinguish

xigoi 54 minutes ago | parent

Of course they’re not free for Meta, as they allow people to access other sites than Facebook.

ciefa 1 hour ago | parent

Simply insane. But honestly if anyone is using Facebook still that's on them. I can't fathom how people still use it.

puddnutz 47 minutes ago | parent

I suffer using it because many people jumped ship from Craigslist to Facebook Marketplace.

Good deals and things can still certainly be found on Craigslist, and there seems to have been a rebound lately in use, but for a while there all that was left on Craigslist was old timers and resellers.

jimbokun 13 minutes ago | parent

Simplest way for my Mom to keep track of what her extended family is up to and communicate with them. Changing would require all of them moving to a different platform.

SwellJoe 1 hour ago | parent

Surveillance capitalists have built a truly miserable internet.

I've been researching local newspapers, and the problems they face, lately, and one of them is that none of the social media sites allow them to get any visits from their followers because they either significantly de-rank posts with links off-site or it costs money to reach followers with links, or both. Of course Google scraping their sites and summarizing is another symptom of the same problem; FAANG wants all the revenue and a monopoly on what you see. Every penny every eyeball. None for small businesses, none for independent media, none for individuals.

gdulli 15 minutes ago | parent

> Surveillance capitalists have built a truly miserable internet.

The way I saw it put recently: the internet used to be a library and now it's a store.

AndrewKemendo 1 hour ago | parent

Genuinely, I think having a postal code based swap system run by post offices would be the ideal situation

You get both the safety of a public place to meet and identity verification through your post office representative

Seems like a win for everyone and we get FB out of the way

detourdog 40 minutes ago | parent

and postal money orders.

belak 1 hour ago | parent

I wonder if this is an effort to combat pages which post a short clickbait description and require you to click "read more" to see the full description, and often post the link in the comments. There are lots of sites (Polygon immediately comes to mind) which are notorious for doing this as a way to get fake engagement which boosts their posts which gets more clickbait engagement.

I know it's all speculation, and this does come across as more monetization creep, but I can't help to wonder if there's an underlying reason beyond "line go up".

hattmall 46 minutes ago | parent

Yeah I mean it's a problem I'm in groups that just get tons of spam to things off-site that are mainly scams or just fake to get you to view a an ad-ridden page.

sparky_twofort 46 minutes ago | parent

I have a friend who is a best-selling author, and her threads account was being heavily throttled (hundreds of likes a few months ago, fewer than ten now) -- it was suggested that it's because she is posting links away from Meta properties, and the way around it was this "link in the comments" tactic.

So it's not necessarily clickbait -- seems to be also an evolved workaround to fight throttling. :-/

QuercusMax 32 minutes ago | parent

This is one thing that distinguishes Bluesky from other sites: they don't penalize you for linking outside the platform

robin_reala 23 minutes ago | parent

Yet. They’ll have to claw back the PE cash at some point.

wavemode 6 minutes ago | parent

Is it so wrong for those who create content to want people to visit their website to consume that content? The alternative being that Facebook and Google summarize everyone's content and keep all the engagement and profit for themselves.

sergiotapia 1 hour ago | parent

They are in the squeezing what's left position for that platform. Young kids think of facebook like we think of myspace. Social media as a platform in fact may just be over. my kids don't really use social media, they use whatsapp/iphone groups.

in fact... maybe kids think of instagram as a boomer unc platform now too.

SoftTalker 52 minutes ago | parent

While it's been longer-lasting than many, social media is a fad and all fads eventually decline. Fundamentally it doesn't do anything that can't be done in a group chat. Thanks to the "forever memory" of the internet, people have learned the risks of posting anything where it will be scraped and preserved for eternity, ready to haunt you when it's most awkward.

f311a 1 hour ago | parent

In think in the future, they will charge users for posting anything more than x times a months.

Generating slop content is cheap now, but you need to store it and very few people will see it, so you can't show more ads.

totetsu 51 minutes ago | parent

What if i just post a QR code?

tsunamifury 48 minutes ago | parent

This is a bi-directional play. For the vast majority that dont, this is an attempt to get more content INSIDE the facebook ecosystem as a moat, and for those that need outside content links they will pay since its a organic premium conversion.

Not defending it, just explaining the logic and why it might work even if it seems superficially stupid.

dtdynasty 47 minutes ago | parent

Seems like an anti spam measure. Bad actors ruin all features where links can be placed in front of eyes.

tuveson 37 minutes ago | parent

I think this is far too charitable an interpretation. They could just ban spammers. Facebook doesn’t want links going off of their platform because they get paid for people staying on their platform and looking at ads.

chrismarlow9 26 minutes ago | parent

Easier to harvest content for AI. Scraping the open internet is going to get more challenging.

micromacrofoot 47 minutes ago | parent

Can we just stop using Facebook as a defacto business/organizational page? come on people. I've been login-gated from what should be public pages for the better part of a decade now.

BatchJob 44 minutes ago | parent

Rug pull!!!! I love it

rickcarlino 41 minutes ago | parent

In the 2010s, there was a move away from files in the name of convenience (lock-in).

The 2020s are a war on hyperlinks. It is particularly unfortunate to see this masquerading as a concern for safety and security (“everything outside of our platform is scary and insecure”)

hungryhobbit 30 minutes ago | parent

"War on hyperlinks"?

I get that Facebook is trying to make some $$$ on them here, but I wasn't aware we had any war (not even a "war on Christmas" fake war) going on against links.

NewJazz 25 minutes ago | parent

Every platform hates links. Xitter started trying to make links look like pictures, for example.

https://dev.to/ascorbic/bring-back-the-twitter-link-preview-...

billyp-rva 23 minutes ago | parent

For a long time. Essentially all social media will heavily downrank any post that includes a link. They don't want you leaving.

slfnflctd 23 minutes ago | parent

Posts containing links to external sites which are not owned by the parent company are downranked or outright excluded in many social media feeds. This has been a known pattern for many years.

It's not only Facebook doing it, but they are probably the biggest offender.

mixdup 19 minutes ago | parent

Is this what's behind the "link to the article in comments" that all news outlets do on FB?

pxx 14 minutes ago | parent

this stuff might be cargo cult, but there's also an interaction/engagement signal because you have to expand the comments so the post itself might be higher ranked when they do this

ekholm_e 23 minutes ago | parent

X deprioritizes content that includes links outside of X.

add-sub-mul-div 18 minutes ago | parent

It's a shame that Musk's politics are a distraction from the ways that Twitter has become hostile and worse for non-political reasons. That was the first place I became aware of hyperlinks causing posts to get hidden or downranked.

steve1977 13 minutes ago | parent

One could argue the two (Musk's politics and Twitter's actions) are related

Forgeties79 5 minutes ago | parent

Try clinking hyperlinks on any modern platform that A) don't try to open in-platform, and/or B) don't try to generate an AI summary of its content as the default rather than open it (looking at you Hubspot), and/or C) don't hit you with a modal that requires you to check a box in addition to clicking through.

It's always like this. Just keep adding layers of friction until people don't bother. Engagement is still the obsession.

philipwhiuk 41 minutes ago | parent

This is to get sites that monetize Facebook as a funnel to pay.

zahrevsky 39 minutes ago | parent

Do they even know what H stands for in HTML?

binlog 39 minutes ago | parent

Title isn’t fully accurate. This is specifically for business pages. You can still post links on your own profile or groups.

kalabrium 36 minutes ago | parent

Well, there should be someway to fund all the ai efforts. On the other hand, I am hoping this reduces the extremely polarizing posts that seem to fill fb these days.

stared 35 minutes ago | parent

It has been disincentivising links for quite some time, so more opinions and fluff, fewer quality posts and links to external materials.

tapvt 32 minutes ago | parent

My facebook account was taken over by someone, but the safeguards locked it down. I can't access it. Neither, hopefully, can the bad actor.

I don't miss it, though I feel uncomfortable about the situation. Recovery has not been worth the time involved.

What sucks is that now I can't see a whole ton of local content: local event organizers, small businesses, municipal offices and agencies, community groups, etc. have all consolidated on "facebook" as where every announcement goes.

I hope they continue to make it a more obviously hostile walled garden and that organizations of all kinds move away. The network effect it has may be hard to overcome, however.

Benard-dev 30 minutes ago | parent

I didn't know this and kept sharing links on my new page and it was banned from posting.I tried to look for support but just received responses from bots all the time and no human review until I gave up. I ended up starting another page.

billyp-rva 28 minutes ago | parent

Fun historical note: one of the first applications of the internet was the "world wide web" (WWW). The idea was people that people would host HTML files on the internet that would be connect to each other using "links" to form a web of "sites" (called, of course, "websites"). You can still find these websites on the internet if you leave the walled gardens and paywalls, but it takes some effort.

troyvit 26 minutes ago | parent

I keep getting this feeling that we're in late-stage capitalism because of how all the oligarchs are maximizing extraction:

* Facebook with this and its new scraping rules for business accounts

* Turning Venezuela into a fiefdom

* Skydance merger

and on and on. But it's not late stage. It's just capitalism and we'll be reading about the same behavior 10 years from now.

seydor 25 minutes ago | parent

You either get stuck into facebook's tight grip on people's perpetual brain rot, or in google/apple's notification gardens. Welcome to the free and open internet.

alex1138 24 minutes ago | parent

So... what

We have the internet and that's not good enough

You already throttle posts - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14147719

You already act as a piss-poor communications medium https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4151433, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6090712

Is "Metaverse" open web/open protocol? Or just yet another way for Zuckerberg to fuck people over?

sailfast 18 minutes ago | parent

Said it before, but this company's product managers are pure evil.

Engineers are enablers at best. If you are not trapped there by visa issues or vesting problems you should take your money and RUN.

meerita 12 minutes ago | parent

I quit Facebook in 2012. I cannot imagine what's there but in 2019 I had to create a new account to test some development stuff, and checked friends and family and it was pretty much dead.

jeanpah 7 minutes ago | parent

Its a ghostown, nothing more that our digital footpritn from we were young and wild.

Waterluvian 4 minutes ago | parent

Stepping into my wife’s shoes, it’s absolutely not a ghost town. It’s where she communicates with community members and other parents of kids at our local school. It’s how we talk about utility issues, road closures, and other local events.

sixhobbits 9 minutes ago | parent

yep, run a small non-tech business too (new for me) so I got to learn all about 'normie' FB marketing and it's absolutely trash from a business perspective

- we had this link limit for a few months already

- every business portal to upload content etc is super buggy, just shows loading spinners, you never know if a post has worked or not

- we're locked out of our instagram account as we took it over from old owners who don't know password and none of the reset options arrive even though they have access to them

- we finally got an email 2fa to go through to recover the account and that then asked for the SMS too, which never arrives

- there is of course absolutely no way to contact support

Unfortunately it's the only platform all our customers are on. They don't even have Google accounts, it's all WhatsApp, Facebook and phones.

nprateem 6 minutes ago | parent

And I just discovered today that posting a tweet via the X API costs $0.20 if it contains a link. They'll all head this way as they think they're too big to fail.