271 points AshleysBrain 1 hour ago 179 comments
ChrisArchitect 1 hour ago | parent
superkuh 1 hour ago | parent
idiotsecant 1 hour ago | parent
DataDaemon 1 hour ago | parent
sirnicolaz 1 hour ago | parent
Kim_Bruning 1 hour ago | parent
mondobe 1 hour ago | parent
bigbuppo 1 hour ago | parent
AndrewKemendo 1 hour ago | parent
apercu 1 hour ago | parent
grumpopotamus 1 hour ago | parent
ruszki 50 minutes ago | parent
unnamed76ri 40 minutes ago | parent
Doohickey-d 40 minutes ago | parent
mightyham 1 hour ago | parent
cma 1 hour ago | parent
magicalist 1 hour ago | parent
bluGill 1 hour ago | parent
Ajedi32 1 hour ago | parent
afavour 1 hour ago | parent
SwellJoe 59 minutes ago | parent
josefresco 1 hour ago | parent
iugtmkbdfil834 15 minutes ago | parent
jstummbillig 1 hour ago | parent
TrackerFF 1 hour ago | parent
geoffschmidt 49 minutes ago | parent
celsoazevedo 20 minutes ago | parent
I still remember when Facebook Pages were promoted as an alternative to feeds and newsletters. You could follow a page and be sure to receive all updates from them. Now you even have to pay to share links.
writtenone 1 hour ago | parent
Timshel 1 hour ago | parent
rcr-anti 1 hour ago | parent
SwellJoe 1 hour ago | parent
By banning spammers and scammers. Facebook opts not to ban scammers, as it's a significant portion of their revenue, and the latest AI slop is very good for engagement.
ok123456 8 minutes ago | parent
https://www.reuters.com/investigations/meta-is-earning-fortu...
wg0 1 hour ago | parent
Nothing much left to innovate.
tapland 1 hour ago | parent
The few groups I'm in, local wildlife and pet bird groups, mainly consist of people asking questions that need to and are usually answered by posting links to local resources or regulations.
biker142541 53 minutes ago | parent
woadwarrior01 48 minutes ago | parent
codingisfreedom 1 hour ago | parent
These people have arguably contributed nothing to society for over a decade (and maybe even made it worse in some instances) for very fat salaries, and yet they’re being praised for being the example of best engineers.
I periodically use their websites and they’re horrible!
Seriously, we should know better as the dev-tech society.
And I don’t give a darn about their research that is being built on top of barely legal mass surveillance so don’t tell me their contributions from stealing data were helpful.
probably_wrong 1 hour ago | parent
How does this work fits with their mission of destroying the fabric of society and the mental well-being of teenagers, I cannot explain.
gilrain 1 hour ago | parent
Naturally, they do it to earn "some respect" from those who otherwise see them clearly.
functionmouse 59 minutes ago | parent
A_D_E_P_T 49 minutes ago | parent
Meta earned a ton of goodwill by doing this -- it was very brave, and very influential. In my eyes, it outweighs everything negative they've ever done.
latexr 46 minutes ago | parent
Are you being sarcastic? Please let it be that you’re being sarcastic.
alerighi 36 minutes ago | parent
You can't study them, you can't modify them, you can't improve them, you can't look into how they are built etc.
boothby 56 minutes ago | parent
cromka 50 minutes ago | parent
latexr 48 minutes ago | parent
Their mission is to make Zuckerberg rich and powerful. That’s the sole purpose of Meta, everything else is incidental. It just so happens that they also destroy the fabric of society and the mental well-being of teenagers but it’s not their primary goal, they just don’t care about the side effect. It would be all the same if they were poisoning coral reefs and giving wedgies to grandmothers instead. As long as the process benefits Zuckerberg in the end, nothing else matters to the company.
wildzzz 44 minutes ago | parent
philipallstar 30 minutes ago | parent
Applejinx 25 minutes ago | parent
crest 17 minutes ago | parent
They also work hard to force users into their walled gardens and to stop the useful content users to this day feed into they intentionally broken services from escaping into the real world wide web of hyperlinked and discoverable content.
In short they're at the forefront of making the internet harmful to society and less useful to almost everyone.
crest 29 minutes ago | parent
aaronrobinson 25 minutes ago | parent
This is the funniest thing I’ve read on here.
Alifatisk 1 hour ago | parent
React? We can all criticize it, but it has revolutionized the web. Llama. Did you forget what sparked the whole open-weight wave? It was that. I dislike Meta, but I would not criticize the engineers competence. They have done impressive things, check out their blog if you genuinely are curious.
soperj 1 hour ago | parent
Personally I hate what react has done to the web.
mahboi 58 minutes ago | parent
dsauerbrun 58 minutes ago | parent
calebio 55 minutes ago | parent
__MatrixMan__ 37 minutes ago | parent
thesuitonym 49 minutes ago | parent
adamnemecek 40 minutes ago | parent
alerighi 34 minutes ago | parent
Now to load a simple website that in the past was a few kB of HTML, CSS and JS you need to download Mb of JS code. Now the browser needs to use Mb of RAM just to display a stupid webpage.
For what? It was better when we had PHP pages that did produce HTML on the server side.
Another thing to me that we have to get Meta discredit for, not something good in any way.
hnlmorg 27 minutes ago | parent
DonHopkins 29 minutes ago | parent
For how unoriginal, unreactive, and mind-numbingly iterative over virtual DOM React is, it should be named Repeat.
"Things seem to hang on in computing just because they work a little bit." -Alan Kay
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8841428
Alan Kay also said this about his famous "Point of View is worth 80 IQ points" quote, which I think poignantly explains why React costs a net of 160 IQ points compared to Svelte:
>I have been keeping to "80" IQ points in the saying (thus avoiding inflation). However very few people have noticed there is no sign bit in the aphorism, and that it works just as well for "poor perspectives being worth negative 80 IQ points" (and I think we could claim inflation of stupidity in many bad directions these days ...).
Rich Harris: Rethinking Reactivity:
https://svelte.dev/blog/svelte-3-rethinking-reactivity
>There are some important technical differences (as I explain in the video above, React is not reactive) but conceptually it’s the same thing.
blazing234 23 minutes ago | parent
thinkingtoilet 55 minutes ago | parent
gunslinger_meta 43 minutes ago | parent
hnfong 31 minutes ago | parent
Pretty much in the same way that a significant number of people in tech who wants a good paying job looks up to people working for Zuckerberg.
blazing234 18 minutes ago | parent
__MatrixMan__ 33 minutes ago | parent
Taikonerd 53 minutes ago | parent
Like, even in its heyday, it was such an attention trap, and it had very negative effects on the people who got addicted (especially teens).
But the site has gotten so much worse in the past couple years, and its brand is in the garbage. Maybe that's all for the best -- it was never really worth preserving.
yndoendo 33 minutes ago | parent
There needs to be an easy to use low-cost, possible also advertisement driven, alternative that business can latch to so more can leave facebook.
I actively refuse to support Meta and block all their domain names in case of clicking on a tiny URL that sends me to their site. It also helps block their analytics used by 3rd parties. I will forever be a sunk cost for them.
999900000999 53 minutes ago | parent
You’re arguably a war criminal either way, might as well get top dollar.
criddell 50 minutes ago | parent
giancarlostoro 50 minutes ago | parent
Only because the longer you work there, probably the more you've been able to handle while you time there, but I don't really care if you worked at Meta or at Momandpop Software Corp down the road, I care about your personality and ability to learn and adapt, these are stronger signals of the types of devs I want to work with than anything else. I'd still consider you, but I might pass on you if I feel more confident about someone else.
thesuitonym 49 minutes ago | parent
By whom? I haven't seen anyone say something positive about Meta or their employees for at least 15 years, unless you count people who were being paid to write PR articles.
v3ss0n 47 minutes ago | parent
That two libraries already build Frontend and AI.
lgl 27 minutes ago | parent
And yes, I mean facebook.com
password54321 27 minutes ago | parent
smashah 41 minutes ago | parent
mnd999 33 minutes ago | parent
I don’t think that’s a maybe. There’s actual research on social media addiction. For me, getting off Facebook improved my life.
qurren 33 minutes ago | parent
So now it's "pay $50 to post 2 links" but does that guarantee them showing it to your followers and friends? If NOT -- is that sufficient reason for a fraud lawsuit?
ipozgaj 32 minutes ago | parent
React, React Native, GraphQL, LLama, PyTorch, RocksDB, Cassandra, folly, Hack, HHVM, OCP, Presto, btrfs, cgroupsv2/PSI, eBPF, zstd, roughly 12% of all Linux kernel contributions are signed off by Meta + Meta is the 5th biggest contributor to Linux kernel.
Also a ton of other projects that did not originally come out of Meta but get a ton of patches and support/funding: MySQL, Memcached, Hadoop, LLVM, Systemd, Rust, Python etc.
Perhaps research a bit more before you make these ignorant comments.
blazing234 25 minutes ago | parent
I don't know anything about the other things so I can't say if they are good or not. But acting as if react is some big invention is crazy. bell Labs gave us Unix and C. Meta isn't even close to inventing something like that.
Henchman21 25 minutes ago | parent
NoGravitas 9 minutes ago | parent
Bluescreenbuddy 25 minutes ago | parent
phatskat 24 minutes ago | parent
From the messed up self-image issues they instill on children to the hand they played - either intentionally or through pure ignorance - in ethnic cleansing, I couldn't care less about what they've done in the tech space when those commits are signed in blood.
iugtmkbdfil834 13 minutes ago | parent
My subtle point is that there are a lot of real reasons to dislike Meta. No reason to have hate blind you..
tempestn 12 minutes ago | parent
It's certainly possible to see the company as a net negative for society while also recognizing those contributions. One could even argue that that could simultaneously be the case, while the net effects of some particular devs working there are positive.
brendoelfrendo 23 minutes ago | parent
saulpw 22 minutes ago | parent
I mean, Hack? Who cares?
tempestn 8 minutes ago | parent
the__alchemist 10 minutes ago | parent
fasterik 31 minutes ago | parent
hvb2 25 minutes ago | parent
fasterik 15 minutes ago | parent
buriram 31 minutes ago | parent
Now tell me where else can I find such a company having that?
I only care about competitive programming and solve algorithm problem. Nothing else matter: I don't care about product, frontend, security, data pipeline, bla bla nonsense.
And by the way, $400k+ salary in cash and RSU please. No stock options, thank you.
blazing234 19 minutes ago | parent
buriram 14 minutes ago | parent
And by the way, you fought through all of that for a $15k-20k ARR contract. Never again, thank you.
Oh, and the PMs are just drones sitting in a room doing nothing but talks and herding the engineers like chicken, and try to claim credits for all the work engineers do. Never met a competent PM in my life.
LPisGood 28 minutes ago | parent
jacquesm 27 minutes ago | parent
Not as FB. But they have shipped a lot of useful stuff. That doesn't mean the company is suddenly great and all should be forgiven but there is some nuance here.
krisoft 26 minutes ago | parent
> I seriously can’t understand why there’s so much respect for anyone that works at Meta.
Is there? Thats new for me.
> yet they’re being praised for being the example of best engineers
Are they? I associate meta with the “move fast and break things” philosophy, not engineering excelence.
I’m sure there are some fine engineers there. But by and large it is just a big company with questionable ethics and lots of money.
mancerayder 26 minutes ago | parent
But from a technical perspective, Google breaks constantly. Here's one. On Pixel you could use Assistant to start a timer or open an application. For years. Then Gemini is forced (first opt in, then forced, as is the Google Way)- there's no way to turn off voice out loud response, and opening apps - the most basic thing - doesn't work.
Then you have long-standing headaches like Gmail interface, reports of people's businesses getting blocked on Google Workspace, etc.
Facebook is blamed for that data broker scandal and making us hate our families due to political arguments. Google does all the same data broker stuff, and other than not being a forever scroll social media site, it's morally and technically repugnant.
blazing234 24 minutes ago | parent
It ain't the same as the Bell Labs days. They try to larp as if they are the computer scientists of old but none of them are. They are just there for the salary and prestige and that's it.
yodsanklai 22 minutes ago | parent
Meta has a bad reputation in some circles, but I don't think there's anything peculiar or particularly evil about them, at least not worse than similar publicly traded big tech companies. They are amoral money-making entities.
That being said I agree that their products suck. I don't use them, besides what's app because it's difficult to avoid. It's also end to end encrypted so it doesn't really matter regarding mass surveillance.
roadside_picnic 9 minutes ago | parent
For a fairly sizable portion of the population (especially the tech worker population), salary/TC is seen as the measure of someone's value as a human being. I've had acquaintances who really, sincerely struggled to understand the concept than an engineer making 1/N what an engineer at Meta/Google/etc does could be overall a better engineer. The typical reply has been something along the lines of "but if they're better, why don't they just make more money?"
They really couldn't understand when I tried to explain that, in my experience, nearly all the really brilliant and interesting technical people I knew tended to be making less, because they would rather work on interesting problems with a high degree of control than play leveling games at a large corporation.
Quitschquat 6 minutes ago | parent
apt-get 1 hour ago | parent
Those hyperlinks ain't free, you know.
ciefa 1 hour ago | parent
puddnutz 47 minutes ago | parent
Good deals and things can still certainly be found on Craigslist, and there seems to have been a rebound lately in use, but for a while there all that was left on Craigslist was old timers and resellers.
jimbokun 13 minutes ago | parent
SwellJoe 1 hour ago | parent
I've been researching local newspapers, and the problems they face, lately, and one of them is that none of the social media sites allow them to get any visits from their followers because they either significantly de-rank posts with links off-site or it costs money to reach followers with links, or both. Of course Google scraping their sites and summarizing is another symptom of the same problem; FAANG wants all the revenue and a monopoly on what you see. Every penny every eyeball. None for small businesses, none for independent media, none for individuals.
gdulli 15 minutes ago | parent
The way I saw it put recently: the internet used to be a library and now it's a store.
AndrewKemendo 1 hour ago | parent
You get both the safety of a public place to meet and identity verification through your post office representative
Seems like a win for everyone and we get FB out of the way
detourdog 40 minutes ago | parent
belak 1 hour ago | parent
I know it's all speculation, and this does come across as more monetization creep, but I can't help to wonder if there's an underlying reason beyond "line go up".
hattmall 46 minutes ago | parent
sparky_twofort 46 minutes ago | parent
So it's not necessarily clickbait -- seems to be also an evolved workaround to fight throttling. :-/
wavemode 6 minutes ago | parent
sergiotapia 1 hour ago | parent
in fact... maybe kids think of instagram as a boomer unc platform now too.
SoftTalker 52 minutes ago | parent
f311a 1 hour ago | parent
Generating slop content is cheap now, but you need to store it and very few people will see it, so you can't show more ads.
totetsu 51 minutes ago | parent
tsunamifury 48 minutes ago | parent
Not defending it, just explaining the logic and why it might work even if it seems superficially stupid.
dtdynasty 47 minutes ago | parent
tuveson 37 minutes ago | parent
chrismarlow9 26 minutes ago | parent
micromacrofoot 47 minutes ago | parent
BatchJob 44 minutes ago | parent
rickcarlino 41 minutes ago | parent
The 2020s are a war on hyperlinks. It is particularly unfortunate to see this masquerading as a concern for safety and security (“everything outside of our platform is scary and insecure”)
hungryhobbit 30 minutes ago | parent
I get that Facebook is trying to make some $$$ on them here, but I wasn't aware we had any war (not even a "war on Christmas" fake war) going on against links.
NewJazz 25 minutes ago | parent
https://dev.to/ascorbic/bring-back-the-twitter-link-preview-...
billyp-rva 23 minutes ago | parent
slfnflctd 23 minutes ago | parent
It's not only Facebook doing it, but they are probably the biggest offender.
mixdup 19 minutes ago | parent
pxx 14 minutes ago | parent
ekholm_e 23 minutes ago | parent
add-sub-mul-div 18 minutes ago | parent
steve1977 13 minutes ago | parent
Forgeties79 5 minutes ago | parent
It's always like this. Just keep adding layers of friction until people don't bother. Engagement is still the obsession.
philipwhiuk 41 minutes ago | parent
zahrevsky 39 minutes ago | parent
binlog 39 minutes ago | parent
kalabrium 36 minutes ago | parent
stared 35 minutes ago | parent
tapvt 32 minutes ago | parent
I don't miss it, though I feel uncomfortable about the situation. Recovery has not been worth the time involved.
What sucks is that now I can't see a whole ton of local content: local event organizers, small businesses, municipal offices and agencies, community groups, etc. have all consolidated on "facebook" as where every announcement goes.
I hope they continue to make it a more obviously hostile walled garden and that organizations of all kinds move away. The network effect it has may be hard to overcome, however.
Benard-dev 30 minutes ago | parent
billyp-rva 28 minutes ago | parent
troyvit 26 minutes ago | parent
* Facebook with this and its new scraping rules for business accounts
* Turning Venezuela into a fiefdom
* Skydance merger
and on and on. But it's not late stage. It's just capitalism and we'll be reading about the same behavior 10 years from now.
seydor 25 minutes ago | parent
alex1138 24 minutes ago | parent
We have the internet and that's not good enough
You already throttle posts - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14147719
You already act as a piss-poor communications medium https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4151433, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6090712
Is "Metaverse" open web/open protocol? Or just yet another way for Zuckerberg to fuck people over?
sailfast 18 minutes ago | parent
Engineers are enablers at best. If you are not trapped there by visa issues or vesting problems you should take your money and RUN.
meerita 12 minutes ago | parent
jeanpah 7 minutes ago | parent
Waterluvian 4 minutes ago | parent
sixhobbits 9 minutes ago | parent
- we had this link limit for a few months already
- every business portal to upload content etc is super buggy, just shows loading spinners, you never know if a post has worked or not
- we're locked out of our instagram account as we took it over from old owners who don't know password and none of the reset options arrive even though they have access to them
- we finally got an email 2fa to go through to recover the account and that then asked for the SMS too, which never arrives
- there is of course absolutely no way to contact support
Unfortunately it's the only platform all our customers are on. They don't even have Google accounts, it's all WhatsApp, Facebook and phones.
nprateem 6 minutes ago | parent