67 points healsdata 2 hours ago 77 comments

xvxvx 2 hours ago | parent

Elon:’This is a car people will be able to own and drive’.

Someone add that to the list of bullshit he said.

sneak 57 minutes ago | parent

I’d take the other side of that bet. $10k USD says that normal consumers are owning and driving Tesla Roadsters within 10 years.

If you believe what you write, it’s easy money for you. Deal?

wlesieutre 53 minutes ago | parent

Can I take that bet on the one that does flips?

skeeter2020 53 minutes ago | parent

do you normally commit to - and pay a sizeable deposit - ten years before you take deilvery of a new car?

alistairSH 23 minutes ago | parent

$250k USD invested today is ~$400k to ~$600k in 2036.

And that $50k deposit made 9 years ago? That could have been nearly $300k in 2036.

"A fool and his money..."

I don't have any particular problem with a modest (a few 10s of thousands) deposit on a ~3 year timeline that's reasonably confident. But six figures on a 100% speculative consumer good (ie not even remotely an investment)? Oof, no thanks.

clipsy 51 minutes ago | parent

Within 10 years of today, or within 10 years of when it was announced 9 years ago?

sneak 46 minutes ago | parent

From when the statement in question was made, obviously.

alistairSH 20 minutes ago | parent

So, this new promise negates the original 3-year delivery timeline promised in 2017? That timeline, taken alongside Musk's recent "we're no longer a car company" statements is... well, you do you, I guess, but I'm not in the business having handing piles of cash to a billionaire.

2OEH8eoCRo0 42 minutes ago | parent

Did we invent a new logical fallacy? If you believed that you'd bet money on it and since you aren't betting money on it then your argument is invalid!

jefftk 40 minutes ago | parent

If you mean one that can do the stunts from the demo I'm in, but not for $10k: that's more than I'm willing to bet with people I don't know. How about $100, since most of the point of a bet is formalizing a disagreement and showing that you're serious?

otterley 39 minutes ago | parent

Just bet on Polymarket or Kalshi so we can all take your money instead. Post a screenshot of your position so we know you’re not full of baloney.

xvxvx 30 minutes ago | parent

Yeah, I don’t gamble. Just make a mental note that, in 2036 when there are no flying Roadsters for sale, you’re a moron.

vannevar 26 minutes ago | parent

The "other side of that bet" would be betting that ordinary consumers will be driving it in 2028, which is what Elon claimed. A lot can happen in ten years---if Tesla ends up selling a clean-sheet sports car called something else by 2036, would that still count? Or are we talking about this specific model with these specs?

lubujackson 22 minutes ago | parent

"Tesla Roadster" in name, maybe. Tesla Roadster as a flying car that drives up walls? 0% chance of that seeing the light of day.

HarHarVeryFunny 19 minutes ago | parent

The first (much nicer looking!) Roadster Version 2 prototype was announced ~10 years ago (2017), and was never released, and has now been replaced with this, so it's a matter of faith to say it'll ever be released. It'd never sell in sufficient numbers to move the needle for Tesla, probably not even sufficient to recoup development costs.

Note that the only version of the car that could conceivably be street legal is the base one with fan only, and no cold thruster launch - NTSB is never going to approve throwing out a condensation cloud smokescreen on the highway!

ourmandave 27 minutes ago | parent

There's a website dedicated to Elon's predictions.

He tweeted back in 2019 there would be a flying roadster.

Promises made, promises kept?

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1083095876392964096

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1083128521801822213

Broken clock, etc.

https://elonmusk.today/#flying-roadster

Geezus_42 7 minutes ago | parent

Except it doesn't fly, it falls gracefully.

Kevin_Flynn 1 hour ago | parent

... because it was always a PR stunt.

The dialog of the event spelled it out.

"We are here at SpaceX's uh rocket test and development center in McGregor, Texas. It's 4,000 acres. Thank you for having us. Thank you for hosting us, SpaceX."

Establishes SpaceX as a giant.

"we're 20 years from when Elon first introduced the Roadster to the world. And it was really a proof of concept that proved EVs were viable product, fun to drive, could go the distance."

Establishes Elon/Tesla as an innovator. Spells out clearly the context "proof of concept." Associates "demonstrations" with "proof." Introduces the concepts of "fun", "viable", and "longevity" aka "distance."

"They were real cars. And look at how far we've come in those 20 years."

Compares introduction of a car, with current demonstration, and establishes the idea that todays "flying car" is going to be just as successful, given time.

"But you know, the last time we had Roadster and SpaceX together, we put Elons's into orbit."

Establishes "the sky as the limit" as to what these two companies can do together. The heart of the entire sales pitch.

"And you can see there, and you know, Starman is still out there somewhere. Amazing feat."

Defines "creating more space junk for publicity stunts" as an "amazing feat."

"you're going to see the results of what happens when you have a collaboration with the world's best car company and the world's best rocket company."

Repetition of the sales pitch to cement it.

"The future is autonomous, Elon, right? Yes. But this is not an autonomous car. It is the last. Well, it it is technically autonomous for this demo to make sure we don't kill anyone. Correct. So, just in case. Uh, but uh this will actually be long-term the only uh manually driven car that Tesla makes. You're going to have some fun sometimes. Yeah. And so, if you're going to have only one manually driven car, let's uh let's take it to the limits and way past the limits."

Confusion. Establishes autonomous with inevitibility. Claims demo car is not automous, then claims it is autonomous, because its dangerous to drive it manually. Plants the idea that its the only car you're gonna need, you can drive it manually, and its the ultimate experience.

Then, as everyone is confused, they start the countdown, and the magic show commences.

Either you see the scripted psyop aka sales pitch or you don't.

We all watched the same demo.

Some of us saw an amazing future.

The rest of us saw a circus selling timeshare condos.

Tesla and SpaceX are "engineering companies." Engineering is at the heart of what they do.

Wouldn't you have more confidence, if they had engineered something useful for a demonstration as an investor, instead of the song and dance ?

Companies are supposed to produce useful products to generate profits, which is why investors invest, right ?

To me it looks like they are out of actual real useful ideas. If they had a new useful idea why didn't we see it ?

I think this might have lowered institutional investor confidence because it looks like a vegas show and smells like a tourist pump and dump intended to capture the "retail publics" money.

You can do better Elon. I know you can.

ps. I am a Starlink subscriber, and I love the service. Please don't cancel me.

cyanydeez 1 hour ago | parent

Worlds richest nigerian prince wants list of most gullible people.

Kevin_Flynn 1 hour ago | parent

I would pay you to write executive summaries for me.

That was perfect.

onlypassingthru 1 hour ago | parent

Serious question, do better how? What if reusable rockets and S3XY cars were the breakthroughs and everything after is just meh?

Kevin_Flynn 1 hour ago | parent

To be clear, my intention was not to throw shade on SpaceX or Tesla as companies, or on any of their USEFUL products. I like both companies, and their products. I'm a customer.

My intention was to demonstrate the intent behind the demonstration, as physics says this is 100+ times more inefficient than a business jet, and will never fly more than 5 miles given its current size. Thats not me, thats PHYSICS.

This was a sales pitch for a corporate merger, not a product launch.

This is financial engineering.

So by "do better" I meant, think longer term, solve a real problem. They have the resources, and the talent, and we got a donkey show.

pfdietz 1 hour ago | parent

Literal Skynet may be something, but "meh"?

bcatanzaro 51 minutes ago | parent

Tesla isn’t interested in building cars. They canceled SX in order to build the Cybertruck. I expect they’ll let 3Y just get really old.

Instead of S3XY cars we get stunts. Solar roofs, Concept car roadsters, and of course humanoid robots.

If only Tesla would be interested in cars again.

hingler36 1 hour ago | parent

As much as I dislike Tesla, a lot of this feels like pretty standard legalize that would be in most reservation or pre-order documents to protect the company. Can anyone speak to if this is truly unique for in this case?

__m 1 hour ago | parent

well, people are waiting since 9 years, i think that's unique

lberk 50 minutes ago | parent

Unique in what way?

The Trabant often had wait lists of ten or more years[1][2].

The Soviet Lada often had wait times of five to ten years[3].

Even the Morgan Plus 8 had wait lists of (reportedly) a decade long as recently as 1990[4].

[1] - https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/dbp016 [2] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trabant [3] - https://theses.gla.ac.uk/71079/1/10390647.pdf [4] - https://www.morganville.org/history/the-waiting-list

Svip 42 minutes ago | parent

Correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know, no one has taken delivery of the Roadster announced 9 years ago; all of your examples are cars having more demand than supply (and in the case of the Trabant and the Lada, fewer years); as for the Morgan Plus 8, Morgan make a deliberate choice to keep the production figures where they were, despite the high demand. The key difference seems to be between little supply (your examples) and no supply.

Usually, if you had been unable to deliver a product in that time, it's probably about time to cancel it. Of course, I may be wrong, but my understanding is that 9-year-ago-announced Roadster has not been cancelled, and people have not been refunded.

lberk 19 minutes ago | parent

Gotcha, essentially, unique in that the supply has remained zero, and no fulfilled orders/deliveries thus far, despite a nine year duration between initial announcement and the current date. I guess if that bothers you, cancel your order and get a refund? MKBHD has reportedly done so and gotten a full refund[0].

> Usually, if you had been unable to deliver a product in that time, it's probably about time to cancel it.

Why? Seems like demand (in this case) is sufficient enough to still launch the product. If a business has the demand for the product and sufficient capital to continue investing in an area they deem to have a viable product, isn't that their prerogative?

[0] - https://podscripts.co/podcasts/waveform-the-mkbhd-podcast/wh...

RobotToaster 42 minutes ago | parent

First time I've seen "longer queues than the soviet union" used as a defence.

gremlinunderway 26 minutes ago | parent

This has to be a satirical response. Please tell me it's satire. If it's satire it's actually a pretty bad caricature of elon fan boys.

Because I can't believe anyone would seriously make a comparison to a 55+ year old car manufactured in a communist country.

It's like saying that an email server that takes a week to send emails is fine because the wait times for a posted letter in the 1960s could take 2 weeks.

turtlebits 6 minutes ago | parent

Getting tired of all the bystander commentary. It's a toy for rich people. If there's 0 chance you're going to buy it, who really cares about your opinion.

WarmWash 42 minutes ago | parent

The media will turn anything into a story if they sense it can be framed in a way that draws clicks.

ambicapter 24 minutes ago | parent

If there's anything we've learned in the US in the past ten years, is that this new breed of corporations and government officials will gladly take the "standard" set of rules that everyone has been operating in in good faith and exploit the gaps as hard as humanly possible.

micromacrofoot 1 hour ago | parent

There's probably going to be a single trick car someone can demo remotely (no passengers) somewhere like an hour away from LA, it will very often be down for maintenance, and everyone will only be able to buy the street legal version of the car which won't be available for another 3 years

kylecazar 1 hour ago | parent

The reservations are refundable, and even if they weren't, his fanboys with means would buy them anyway.

He still has a lot of wealthy acolytes (for some reason) and they live for exclusive new shit.

jgilias 1 hour ago | parent

Wouldn’t be a first

r0ckarong 1 hour ago | parent

It has vapor thrusters to glide above the ignorant fools who didn't buy one.

delichon 1 hour ago | parent

You'll have about 4 to 11 seconds to gloat.

ambicapter 20 minutes ago | parent

But I can do it every 6 to 8 hours!

JSR_FDED 1 hour ago | parent

Very briefly, before coming back down to earth.

epolanski 1 hour ago | parent

Musk treating delusional fans like an ATM as always, lovely.

There's 1000 people that preordered their Roadster in 2017 for 250k $....

And they are rumoring now 2028 production, which in Tesla style will be deep in 2030s. If it ever happens.

bamboozled 1 hour ago | parent

I love that the FSD feature still hasn't been delivered while they're demonstrating they're next idiotic product idea / stunt...no one mentions it.

LewisVerstappen 1 hour ago | parent

It has been delivered.

I have FSD and it’s amazing.

amanaplanacanal 59 minutes ago | parent

What he delivered is not what he promised.

treis 53 minutes ago | parent

At some point why does anyone care? If something "amazing" was delivered what's the difference if it was exactly as promised.

bamboozled 39 minutes ago | parent

People he has been conning people out of money for 10 years ?

bamboozled 39 minutes ago | parent

Recently the name of the producet was updated to be called "FSD (Supervised), ffs, even if it was delivered, it was called FSD in 2017...basically 10 years ago.

darth_avocado 10 minutes ago | parent

Can you take a nap while on FSD? If not, it’s not FSD

jansport123 1 hour ago | parent

one one hand, i think showmanship can be used to generate interest for something that is far off and thus allow humans to pursue long term goals and i think elon has used this tactic in the past for the right reasons but these days it seems like he just uses this tactic to deceive people - almost like trump.

sportsracersss 57 minutes ago | parent

He's using it to hype his case for SpaceX acquiring Tesla.

Elon's M.O. is to roll his tapped-out prior ventures (including debts) into the current white-hot thing.

andsoitis 52 minutes ago | parent

> He's using it to hype his case for SpaceX acquiring Tesla.

> Elon's M.O. is to roll his tapped-out prior ventures (including debts) into the current white-hot thing.

SpaceX is the long game. It started before Tesla. It is not a fly by night operation.

parsimo2010 47 minutes ago | parent

While I understand your thinking, he rolled Twitter into SpaceX. He absolutely uses it as a financial vehicle, regardless of how legitimate the space business is.

andsoitis 35 minutes ago | parent

It is standard practice for companies to have some of their businesses subsidize other parts of the overall business. Not sure why people are so fixated on this case. It is also not unique to technology at all.

ambicapter 22 minutes ago | parent

X is less of an "other part of the overall business [SpaceX]" and more of a bolted-on, completely unrelated part merged together b/c of financial difficulties.

andsoitis 4 minutes ago | parent

Who cares?

Geezus_42 9 minutes ago | parent

Because Twitter has nothing to do with the actual functioning of SpaceX.

andsoitis 8 minutes ago | parent

Geezus_42, why do you and others care so much about that?

Is it because you are a SpaceX shareholder and you feel your interests as a shareholder are undermined? If you have not vested interest in SpaceX, why would you care that it supports some shitty venture like Twitter/X?

I don't understand.

shigawire 1 minute ago | parent

Because the sky high IPO valuable was mostly based on SpaceX being an AI company that has a huge TAM. Things that have nothing to do with space (please don't say space data centers).

otterley 41 minutes ago | parent

It’s all about how you frame it. He could have framed it as a technology demo instead of as a new car that will ship. That would have been equally impressive and more honest.

Hydraulix989 55 minutes ago | parent

Even the Cybertruck reservations took years to materialize, at a much higher price.

mvkel 52 minutes ago | parent

I maintain that the entire event was to create a trail of evidence that justifies merging Tesla and SpaceX. No car will ever ship.

You can hear it in the voices of the creators, when they're giving an overview of the car to MotorWeek and other car media outlets. 99% focused on the rocket and battery tech/innovation, almost zero about the actual driving characteristics of the car, or that it -is- a car. Seems more like a rolling marketing mule.

andrewtbham 39 minutes ago | parent

100 percent agree... PR stunt to assist acquisition of Tesla so Musk can gain control of Tesla

jgalt212 12 minutes ago | parent

I assume you mean de facto and de jure.

vannevar 34 minutes ago | parent

The specs of the base (non-rocket-powered) car are pretty mediocre: RWD-only with 320 mile range. That's not terribly impressive in 2026, by 2028 it will be obsolete on delivery. The styling can charitably be described as generic. I agree, I don't think they have any intention of making this car.

skybrian 13 minutes ago | parent

How much electric sports car owners care about increasing range beyond 300 miles or so? It seems hard to believe that such a car would be obsolete.

HarHarVeryFunny 11 minutes ago | parent

To be fair the claimed ~1.6sec 0-60 acceleration speed is impressive - this is the benefit of electric - although if you have enough money you can already do that today in the way sexier looking Rimac Nevera R.

dgellow 14 minutes ago | parent

Yeah, that’s also the conclusion I arrived to. It’s a clear step to justify the merger

andai 11 minutes ago | parent

If you will know them by their fruits, then the merger is objectively awesome.

ourmandave 46 minutes ago | parent

Wasn't it purpose built for the Hot Wheels demo?

Insane acceleration to get up the ramp and enough fuel to land safely.

Unless you have a giant ramp or a penchant to drive off cliffs who is lining up for this?

jefftk 44 minutes ago | parent

> Insane acceleration to get up the ramp

It climbed the ramp very slowly. It doesn't require insane acceleration at all, just a reasonable amount of power at the wheels combined with a fan that can hold it to the track.

ourmandave 39 minutes ago | parent

Sorry, I'd only heard a 0 to 60 mph in 1 second and assumed. =[

I suppose the Fast and Furious guys are work shopping a scene around this.

jefftk 38 minutes ago | parent

If you have not watched the ramp video, I really recommend it. It's very impressive, even if it doesn't make any sense in a consumer vehicle.

gandhiandy69 37 minutes ago | parent

100k people will be driving Tesla Roadsters on Mars in 3 years

ZiiS 30 minutes ago | parent

Conversely, I can guarantee they won't get the functionality demoed.

ok123456 22 minutes ago | parent

No insurance will touch that car with a 10-foot pole.