107 points CrankyBear 4 days ago 18 comments
nxobject 3 days ago | parent
eigenspace 3 days ago | parent
atoav 3 days ago | parent
In the end the question is very simple, aside from the rare idealist company all companies seek to earn money. How big of a hit would they be willing to take to defend the rights of their foreign customers?
As a European by this point I find US companies about as trustworthy as Chinese ones, if not more so. With Chinese companies you have the Chinese government as a potential attacker. With US companies you have the US government as a potential attacker. Both is bad, but with US companies I feel that they also have a higher tendency to fuck you over as the customer or to change the deal after the fact. Sure usually they should respect EU law when doing business in theEU, but how well is that working out?
wolvoleo 3 days ago | parent
In the long term this is probably more of a risk because the Chinese strategy actually has long-term planning behind it while the American one is random and a lot of their actions harm themselves more than anyone else. China is the best in the world at playing the long game.
But in the short term the Chinese are more dependable.
wolvoleo 3 days ago | parent
However turning this on reduces the feature set of m365 massively so almost nobody actually uses it.
eigenspace 3 days ago | parent
Vital government functions cannot be allowed to run on this type of infrastructure, it's ridiculous.
kazinator 3 days ago | parent
Stick with it for five (5) years consistently, then report on it.
Neywiny 3 days ago | parent
k12sosse 3 days ago | parent
jolmg 3 days ago | parent
bob1029 3 days ago | parent
There would be very little to talk about.
The harsh reality is that projects like ffmpeg and SQLite are wild exceptions to the rule. You need more than a handful of well engineered OSS components to run a complicated business like this.
leonidasrup 3 days ago | parent
For example, When Munich in 2013 migrated to Linux:
"In 2016, Microsoft relocated its German headquarters to Munich. "
"In 2018, journalistic group Investigate Europe released a video documentary via German public television network ARD that claimed that the majority of city workers were satisfied with the operating system, with council members insinuating that the reversal was a personally motivated decision by mayor Dieter Reiter. Reiter denied that he had initiated the reversal in gratitude for Microsoft moving its German headquarters from Unterschleißheim back to Munich."
DrScientist 3 days ago | parent
It's not just that they don't want to lose a customer - they don't want lots of examples out there of how it can be done.
wolvoleo 3 days ago | parent
The success stories are there but the failures seem to get more press. Which isn't all that surprising IMO.
It's also worth noting that the Dutch tax office this article is about has until now been running on an in house office solution, they had only recently decided to move to Microsoft 365 but for geopolitical reasons this is no longer a good option. The rollout had only just started.
They do run windows but that is not planned to change anyway, this is about their office suite.
hn_submit 3 days ago | parent
They're the ones that probably have access to the most accurate statistics on Linux market share, and they're not liking what they're seeing.
thomasjeff1 3 days ago | parent