14 points csmantle 3 hours ago 4 comments
Dead_Lemon 41 minutes ago | parent
I doubt many are doing this upgrade, and I think its awesome someone has the tooling & skill to do so. I cannot fathom how this is a threat to RPI. I would assume a community firmware patch will likely release & resolve the limitation (until it becomes a signed binary)
eqvinox 36 minutes ago | parent
It's already a signed binary, with rollback protection. (According to Reddit comments; I stopped using Raspis a long time ago)
mrheosuper 16 minutes ago | parent
illright 6 minutes ago | parent
> there may be a minor financial gain in buying a part with say a 2GB part, swapping it for an 8GB part of dubious origin, and reselling it as an 8GB device. However, this brings an element of risk to the user - the board hasn't been tested by us - and is a potential support burden for us, with customers complaining of unreliable devices. We therefore remove the commercial incentive by locking devices to their original RAM size.
Frankly, that sounds pretty reasonable to me