YHK - yet another hacker news clone

Pirate Face Rescues LLM Models from Deletion

121 points skepticalgenius 1 hour ago 42 comments

kevinsimper 1 hour ago | parent

That is pretty smart, torrent should have been used for more things, and this is a perfect usecase!

phoyd 1 hour ago | parent

Torrents should really be the preferred method for distributing AI model weights. Why rely on a single point of failure like Hugging Face? BitTorrent was made for exactly this.

TeMPOraL 52 minutes ago | parent

Yeah, I thought they were used for this already. Surprised this is news, but also relieved.

Oxodao 22 minutes ago | parent

IIRC Mistral used to do it, not sure if that's still the case

EDIT/ Yes they did, that no longer seems to be the case though

https://x.com/MistralAI/status/1833758285167722836

CodesInChaos 44 minutes ago | parent

In my experience public torrents often die as they grow older. It doesn't help that BitTorrent V1 makes long term seeding annoying, and BitTorrent V2 is almost never used.

monsieurbanana 30 minutes ago | parent

I never understood this, is there anything that makes it difficult for the original uploader, the one that supposedly offers the file directly, to offer a torrent instead for the same amount of time?

As far as perennity is concerned it seems strictly better.

cube00 26 minutes ago | parent

If they're no longer using that model they may not be willing to continue using their storage for it.

csomar 21 minutes ago | parent

How does this address the previous point? If they are not providing storage, then centralized or decentralized doesn’t make a difference.

Torrent/P2P can only add redundancy, so it’s impossible to have worse availability than a download link?

_blk 16 minutes ago | parent

You're absolutely right. The problem is convenience. Torrent doesn't integrate as nicely as curl, wget, apt-get, npm, you name it or even in the browser. It doesn't have to be that way but it is currently. Is there a fully in-browser torrent option that has the same UX as a regular file download in Firefox? Even better for others/the system would be to then keep sharing by default as long as the file's on your drive..

pell 8 minutes ago | parent

> Is there a fully in-browser torrent option that has the same UX as a regular file download in Firefox?

Opera did back in the day.

zenoprax 16 minutes ago | parent

Every change to the source is effectively a new torrent. This creates a ton of fragmentation as data is reorganized, remixed, reencoded, and so on.

You can see this with many Linux distros: there is no single Debian torrent that people seed for years because there's always a refreshed version.

Distros are a bad use case for P2P anyway since you depend on upstream as soon as you start upgrading and installing packages.

zenoprax 26 minutes ago | parent

You only need one person/organization to commit to seeding. The majority of people do not want to seed at all without some sort of incentive.

If this site represents a coordinated datahoarding effort then there will be at least a few people who will seed indefinitely.

csomar 15 minutes ago | parent

The last guy (kimdotcom) who was working on this (incentive for seeding) seems to be heading to the US: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/science-and-technology/651123/cou...

It’s interesting he’s no longer getting any media attention any more.

ranger_danger 18 minutes ago | parent

I always wondered why v2 is never used... you can even search for files by their individual hash with it.

bilegeek 14 minutes ago | parent

The biggest problem with BTv1 was the lack of per-file checksumming, and swarm merging (i.e. individual files have shared seeding pools across torrents). BTv2 specs the latter, but I think only BiglyBT actually implements it. Having both of those features from the get-go would've gone a LONG way to fixing the dead torrent problem.

Retr0id 4 minutes ago | parent

A torrent with a webseed is strictly more resilient than a direct download link alone.

boredumb 4 minutes ago | parent

ages ago I tried using IPFS to more or less accomplish this, I imagined it to act more like a weights/training data network fs that everyone would be able to participate in.

yieldcrv 56 minutes ago | parent

great initiative, it's really weird seeing efficiencies get rediscovered in the LLM audience, because these efficiencies aren't even what I would consider to be old

but I guess they are

skeledrew 56 minutes ago | parent

Arguably this should've been a thing since day 1 (and probably would've helped to prevent the buyout), but better late than never.

RobotToaster 51 minutes ago | parent

Hugging face seemed like buyout bait from day one.

Avicebron 47 minutes ago | parent

Which makes it more surprising that something like this didn't exist. I'm relieved it does though.

casper14 48 minutes ago | parent

Honestly, models are torrents will end any effort from the big AI labs to stop open models. No way to prevent weights from being shared, just like mobies. Genie is out of the bottle

mococa 44 minutes ago | parent

Steam & Blizzard (probably others) used to delivery games through torrent protocol in the past, before CDNs became cheaper.

When StarCraft 2 was lauched, the installer (before Battle.net installer crapware) had a complete graphical visualization of seeders & leechers.

Reference: https://warcraft.wiki.gg/wiki/Blizzard_Downloader

alexpotato 40 minutes ago | parent

I've worked at trading firms where the "reference data master" file is usually a big json or equivalent.

To get the file out to 100s or 1000s of machine they would often use private bittorent to distribute the file out.

mococa 38 minutes ago | parent

Same here. Inspired by both, I used to delivery videos over torrent to in door machines since at that time, there's no CDNs (or it was difficult to get one).

bayindirh 21 minutes ago | parent

Oh, story time:

Once I was using Blizzard's downloader to install something (StarCraft, Diablo, I don't remember), and it was kinda slow. I disabled P2P downloads and speed skyrocketed, and I said "Huh, this was unexpected".

When P2P downloads disabled you could see the list of CDNs you're downloading from and mine had a single IP on that list. It looked familiar. Then it dawned on to me. It was the Akamai server which we were hosting in our system room, at 15 minutes of driving distance. After a chuckle, I went to get a cup of tea, because that was entertaining than the game itself.

Then of course, I dived into whatever I was installing that night.

Aurornis 14 minutes ago | parent

Several companies tried this for distributing software.

It was very controversial. Users were angry that software companies were using their internet bandwidth to distribute their software. Made a lot of people angry.

bananaflag 44 minutes ago | parent

Now I want GPT-4.5

reilly3000 39 minutes ago | parent

I’ve been wondering when this will come. The days are numbered for abliterated models to be published on HF I think. Why wouldn’t the government want a central control there?

grommz 36 minutes ago | parent

If I search for 'uncensored' there are no torrents available. Uncensored models should be top priority, especially now that Nvidia owns HuggingFace and will enshittify the platform in accordance with upcoming US laws.

sneurlax 34 minutes ago | parent

There are such results on huggingface tho. Also search for the keywords “abliteration” and “heretic”. Heretic is a tool used to abliterate, that is decensor, models

behole 26 minutes ago | parent

That was my my first search too. I know they are still listed on HF but every time I try and use one, the links are dead or the size is beyond my scope. Was hoping for a fresh batch. Ill check back.

hgoel 22 minutes ago | parent

Torrents always seemed like the more sensible way to distribute model weights.

Though I have been disappointed that most of these have been spurred on by the misleading claim that abliterated models were being taken down from HuggingFace because they removed an abliterated model. HF took one abliterated model down because the uploader was spamming people who requested access with sketchy requirements to pay for it.

Plus, there are a bunch of these types of sites, all of them have a couple of models and otherwise completely dead.

There's also the problem of catching malicious models that have been fine tuned to exfiltrate credentials. It would be nice to have means of checking hashes against the HF versions (or against other reputable sources). I'm guessing this is probably easy when just serving the same folder as what HF serves.

wren6991 14 minutes ago | parent

Speaking to the "uncensored model" angle: there's little reason to distribute abliterated weights anyway. Instead of orthogonalising the weights that write back to the residual stream, you can just orthogonalise the activations themselves. It's equivalent.

Orthogonalising activations at runtime is computationally cheap. Just distribute the refusal vectors (few thousand floats per layer), then run against the stock weights. Antirez's DS4 already supports this: https://github.com/antirez/ds4/blob/8db1d1d155cb0400a86a86b9...

Abliterated weights are just a bad habit we've gotten into. It's also deeply suboptimal from a precision point of view to take a model that's already been QATed and distributed in pre-quantised form (DeepSeek V4, Kimi K2.5 or K3...), modify its weights, and re-quantise it. Similarly, abliterated models regain some of their refusal behaviour when they're re-quantised after abliteration -- avoidable by keeping the two separate.

jamienk 8 minutes ago | parent

Can you explain this a bit to a non-expert?

I haven't wrapped my mind around this

mitxela 4 minutes ago | parent

Instead of editing the weights so they don't create the refusal signal, just let them do whatever, then delete the refusal signal itself. You don't want to edit quantised weights because it causes a loss of precision that can be pretty bad.

Razengan 12 minutes ago | parent

So begins the Merovingian and the Exiles..

wolfy1993 11 minutes ago | parent

I'd support this if I didn't have to post to xitter to claim my username.

Really odd approach.