44 points hggh 2 hours ago 28 comments
foul 1 hour ago | parent
It was nice to use when I tried to dabble with it.
novacrazy 1 hour ago | parent
ecto 1 hour ago | parent
MisterTea 1 hour ago | parent
novacrazy 1 hour ago | parent
However, over the years some actually talented people (and nowadays probably LLMs) have somehow sort of fixed most of the biggest warts, but it's still nowhere near what it advertised in that first release.
morpheos137 1 hour ago | parent
giancarlostoro 1 hour ago | parent
I don't mind supporting a project like this, but this is a bit excessive.
Was it really Go's parser? That wouldn't surprise me, but also that kind of makes sense to me why it looked a bit 'familiar' in terms of syntax.
It's definitely been "alpha" tier for a while, which it doesnt help that the developer doesn't outline any sort of stability that I can recall (back then at least) which imho if you're publishing a language, you should let the reader know.
torstenvl 1 hour ago | parent
novacrazy 1 hour ago | parent
torstenvl 1 hour ago | parent
I'm open to being wrong. So again, can you explain what you mean?
novacrazy 1 hour ago | parent
wk_end 49 minutes ago | parent
They haven't had a stable 1.0 release yet, but they've had many pre-1.0 releases. It's not some personal experiment that's been sitting in the dev's Github that people are piling onto; the author has gone out of their way to promote it, beg for donations, and lash out at any criticisms.
The issue has never been the quality of the language per se, the issue has been 1) wildly misrepresenting the quality of the language in the present tense; 2) not even having any kind of a realistic roadmap towards achieving the kind of outsized and implausible claims about the quality of the language; and 3) using these outsized, implausible misrepresentations as a way of soliciting hype and funding for the author.
torstenvl 23 minutes ago | parent
ape4 1 hour ago | parent
embedding-shape 1 hour ago | parent
I never paid enough attention to figure out if the drama is justified or not (and don't really care either, please don't try to convince me to care either, don't shoot the messenger).
orsenthil 1 hour ago | parent
IshKebab 1 hour ago | parent
netbioserror 22 minutes ago | parent
christophilus 50 minutes ago | parent
bflesch 43 minutes ago | parent
codethief 38 minutes ago | parent
Huh, since when does QEMU support hardware virtualization on Apple Silicon? To the best of my knowledge, among all the VM managers available on macOS (VMware, Parallels, VirtualBox, …) only UTM currently supports hardware virtualization and that's through the Apple Virtualization backend, not through QEMU.