20 points bryanrasmussen 1 hour ago 6 comments

itchingsphynx 1 hour ago | parent

Note, this article is from 2013.

>We do well to remember that “scripture” and “canon” are different things, and of course we should never make the mistake of thinking that early Christians had Bibles like our own.

Reading any of this ancient text is like tourism.

stavros 1 hour ago | parent

It's so refreshing to see that there used to exist authors other than Claude.

geocar 33 minutes ago | parent

> Reading any of this ancient text is like tourism.

You may enjoy the "map" on page two:

https://web.archive.org/web/20081031050603/http://www.tniv.c...

monideas 37 minutes ago | parent

The Septuagint was only the Torah (five Books of Moses). It wasn’t until much later that Greek translations of the rest of the Hebrew Bible were done. These are often referred to as the Septuagint but that is not accurate, these later translations were not done by some official group of 70 Rabbis.

gampleman 28 minutes ago | parent

This is clearly written from a western Christian view. It should be noted for completeness that the Eastern Orthodox Church still uses the Septuagint (in Greek speaking churches in the original, in others with suitable translations thereof; in English I like https://www.amazon.co.uk/Orthodox-Study-Bible-OE-Some-NKJV/d...).

I’d be curious to know if this difference in scriptural base also contributed to the great schism?

Alien1Being 13 minutes ago | parent

Depending on your religion, God speaks:

Sankrit,

Avestan ,

Classical Mandaic,

Hebrew,

the Arabic in the Hijazi dialect of 6th century Arabia,

Punjabi

or Ardhamagadhi.