60 points dividedcomet 1 hour ago 44 comments
CamperBob2 52 minutes ago | parent
gkoberger 50 minutes ago | parent
dividedcomet 26 minutes ago | parent
latexr 2 minutes ago | parent
gopalv 48 minutes ago | parent
My emacs days are 1999 during my "functional or get out" phase, but my .emacs had close to 4000 lines in it, including xterm mouse support, a clone of midnight commander + sftp to a wehbost and deep integration with ctags/cscope/c++filt. There was even a line by line debugger with custom .gdbinit commands - look at the php project's gdbinit[1] if you want an idea of how to walk your own super special data structures.
You can't put Emacs in an IDE comparison and say anything about features without at least one person saying "well, actually".
I eventually switched to vim but that had to do with needing to ssh into 100k+ machines on support rotation & never having emacs on any of them.
alecfv26 42 minutes ago | parent
cyberax 16 minutes ago | parent
Long time ago, in mid-2000-s I tried to switch to Emacs or Vim from Visual Studio.
I wanted to have a simple project file tree as a side panel and multiple editor tabs on the right. I spent a week toying with various elisp scripts, Vim plugins, and digging out information from a then-moribund XEmacs mailing list.
And I couldn't do what I wanted in the end. Nothing worked seamlessly or reliably.
Can this be done out-of-the-box now?
mplanchard 10 minutes ago | parent
LiamPowell 4 minutes ago | parent
colesantiago 47 minutes ago | parent
> Sees "Claude"
Now almost 90% of projects on GitHub including existing projects are now slop or are adding slop.
Many projects are getting contaminated with AI, and even Linux is getting contaminated with this.
There is a list of projects that have non-slop alternatives one can use instead.
jjice 44 minutes ago | parent
The idea that there can be no high quality use of LLMs to aid software development is lacking a lot of nuance.
aniviacat 35 minutes ago | parent
delis-thumbs-7e 31 minutes ago | parent
colesantiago 30 minutes ago | parent
Yes.
To quote the repository:
"slop: Anything generated by AI, typically code, books, articles, or images."
Philpax 35 minutes ago | parent
dividedcomet 27 minutes ago | parent
cnqso 10 minutes ago | parent
kolme 45 minutes ago | parent
kccqzy 38 minutes ago | parent
dbalatero 25 minutes ago | parent
dividedcomet 23 minutes ago | parent
jasonjmcghee 44 minutes ago | parent
"github.com/yourusername/toast/internal/components/breadcrumbs" "github.com/yourusername/toast/internal/components/closedialog" "github.com/yourusername/toast/internal/components/commandpalette" "github.com/yourusername/toast/internal/components/editor"
schainks 28 minutes ago | parent
I need a terminal that just works. If it doesn't work out of the box with sensible defaults, it is indeed not up to snuff, and therefore thrown away immediately. Don't ask me to use your buggy-vibe coded thing if it's not up to snuff, right?
This is coming from someone who did spend hundreds of hours learning to customize their terminal, their vim environment, and put all of it in source control to rot away.
krogenx 28 minutes ago | parent
OSaMaBiNLoGiN 19 minutes ago | parent
Christ.
dividedcomet 16 minutes ago | parent
fwip 4 minutes ago | parent
nosioptar 12 minutes ago | parent
To me, it's just yet another bland low-contrast dark mode interface.
Also, vim has mouse support. Probably shouldn't use a clanker to write your readme if you're not going to take the time to do a basic fact check.
dividedcomet 7 minutes ago | parent
dim13 11 minutes ago | parent
gslepak 4 minutes ago | parent
I wrote this article a while back on how to build a great terminal editor that's better than Emacs and VIM [1], you might find it interesting!
[1] https://gist.github.com/taoeffect/086220456e736cceb30d68834d...
s_dev 2 minutes ago | parent
This seems like all those UI designers who have a crack at redoing Wikipedia and then fail miserably because they just plaster whatever trend on top of something that is universally good.